UESD.L vs. PULS
UESD.L (iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc) and PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, UESD.L returned 3.56%/yr vs 5.24%/yr for PULS. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. UESD.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PULS.
Performance
UESD.L vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UESD.L is traded in GBP, while PULS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PULS values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UESD.L achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 2.11% return.
UESD.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- —
PULS
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- —
UESD.L vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UESD.L iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc | 1.41% | 5.04% | 5.40% | 4.47% | 1.55% | 0.19% | 1.09% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 2.11% | -2.51% | 7.97% | 0.95% | 13.59% | 1.43% | -11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between UESD.L and PULS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2020 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UESD.L vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank
UESD.L
PULS
UESD.L vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc (UESD.L) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UESD.L | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.02 | 0.84 | +3.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.47 | 1.24 | +5.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 1.15 | +0.76 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.99 | 1.10 | +15.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.38 | 3.07 | +70.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UESD.L | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02 | 0.84 | +3.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.20 | 0.62 | +2.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.89 | 0.46 | +2.43 |
Drawdowns
UESD.L vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UESD.L drawdown since its inception was -0.48%, smaller than the maximum PULS drawdown of -15.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UESD.L and PULS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UESD.L | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | -15.09% | +14.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.26% | -4.94% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.26% | -9.54% | +9.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.41% | -15.09% | +14.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -3.42% | +3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -6.64% | +6.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 1.77% | -1.71% |
Volatility
UESD.L vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc (UESD.L) is 0.50%, while PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that UESD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UESD.L | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.50% | 1.73% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.87% | 4.91% | -4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09% | 6.49% | -5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.11% | 8.48% | -7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.06% | 8.74% | -7.68% |
UESD.L vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UESD.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UESD.L vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
UESD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than PULS's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% |
UESD.L iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc | 5.64% | 4.63% | 5.37% | 4.49% | 1.21% | 0.24% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UESD.L and PULS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UESD.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UESD.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PULS.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for UESD.L and 0.15% for PULS.
Find the right allocation for UESD.L and PULS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer