UEIPX vs. QGRPX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

UEIPX (UBS Engage For Impact Fund) and QGRPX (UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund) are both mutual funds - UEIPX is a Global Equities fund managed by UBS, while QGRPX is a Quality Factor fund managed by UBS. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UEIPX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QGRPX.

Performance

UEIPX vs. QGRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Engage For Impact Fund (UEIPX) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UEIPX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

QGRPX

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: -0.90%
• 6M: 1.30%
• YTD: -0.43%
• 1Y: 3.49%
• 3Y*: 16.46%
• 5Y*: 9.45%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

UEIPX vs. QGRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
UEIPX UBS Engage For Impact Fund	8.16%	20.69%	10.39%	16.46%	-22.35%	16.12%	27.40%
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund	-0.43%	15.51%	25.13%	35.52%	-25.57%	29.14%	14.62%

Correlation

The correlation between UEIPX and QGRPX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020	0.74

The correlation between UEIPX and QGRPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UEIPX vs. QGRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UEIPX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QGRPX

QGRPX Risk / Return Rank: 8
QGRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
QGRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
QGRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
QGRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
QGRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UEIPX vs. QGRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Engage For Impact Fund (UEIPX) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UEIPX	QGRPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.27	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.49	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.06	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.25	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.75	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	UEIPX	QGRPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-30.28%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-4.94%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.47%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.58%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UEIPX	QGRPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.45%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.74%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	19.79%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	19.26%	—

UEIPX vs. QGRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEIPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRPX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

UEIPX vs. QGRPX - Dividend Comparison

UEIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.61%, more than QGRPX's 6.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund	6.19%	6.16%	3.62%	0.42%	1.00%	2.84%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%
UEIPX UBS Engage For Impact Fund	12.61%	13.64%	4.91%	0.66%	0.95%	11.99%	0.76%	2.68%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UEIPX and QGRPX in my portfolio?

UEIPX and QGRPX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.