PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEFI.DE vs. XCS2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEFI.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) and Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEFI.DE achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly lower than XCS2.DE's 8.80% return. Over the past 10 years, UEFI.DE has outperformed XCS2.DE with an annualized return of 0.19%, while XCS2.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.29% annualized return.


UEFI.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
1.48%
6M
1.96%
YTD
2.95%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
2.00%
5Y*
-0.85%
10Y*
0.19%

XCS2.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
0.11%
6M
7.57%
YTD
8.80%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
2.65%
5Y*
-1.92%
10Y*
-0.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEFI.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UEFI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.95%-4.76%5.09%-0.05%-9.74%5.04%0.06%11.40%5.58%-10.24%
XCS2.DE
Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
8.80%-2.17%-1.70%0.78%-13.88%-0.26%4.13%9.65%-0.82%-2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between UEFI.DE and XCS2.DE is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between UEFI.DE and XCS2.DE has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEFI.DE vs. XCS2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEFI.DE
UEFI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
UEFI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

XCS2.DE
XCS2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XCS2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEFI.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) and Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UEFI.DEXCS2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.20

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

2.21

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

7.24

-3.94

UEFI.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEFI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the XCS2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEFI.DE and XCS2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UEFI.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.55%, smaller than the maximum XCS2.DE drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEFI.DE and XCS2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEFI.DEXCS2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.55%

-41.58%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.91%

-4.56%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.74%

-12.00%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.68%

-22.36%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.74%

-41.58%

+18.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.40%

-32.75%

+17.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.52%

-25.77%

+11.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.40%

+0.10%

Volatility

UEFI.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) is 1.37%, while Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that UEFI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEFI.DEXCS2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

2.74%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.69%

7.35%

-3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.32%

8.96%

-3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.87%

10.16%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.11%

21.02%

-5.91%

UEFI.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEFI.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS2.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UEFI.DE vs. XCS2.DE - Dividend Comparison

UEFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, while XCS2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UEFI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
3.03%2.22%2.44%2.79%1.42%0.98%2.00%2.11%2.73%1.95%0.85%0.88%
XCS2.DE
Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEFI.DE and XCS2.DE have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UEFI.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UEFI.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XCS2.DE.

UEFI.DE tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while XCS2.DE tracks FTSE Australian Government Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for UEFI.DE and 0.25% for XCS2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEFI.DE and XCS2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer