XCS2.DE vs. IBCC.DE
XCS2.DE (Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IBCC.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Government Bonds funds - XCS2.DE tracks the FTSE Australian Government Bond Index while IBCC.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCS2.DE returned -1.91%/yr vs 4.17%/yr for IBCC.DE. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. XCS2.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBCC.DE.
Performance
XCS2.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS2.DE achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than IBCC.DE's 4.60% return.
XCS2.DE
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 9.20%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- -1.91%
- 10Y*
- -0.09%
IBCC.DE
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- 3.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- —
XCS2.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS2.DE Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 8.74% | -2.17% | -1.70% | 0.78% | -13.88% | -0.26% | 4.13% | 5.15% |
IBCC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.60% | -7.23% | 11.42% | 1.23% | 7.25% | 8.42% | -8.13% | -8.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS2.DE and IBCC.DE is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS2.DE vs. IBCC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCS2.DE
IBCC.DE
XCS2.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCS2.DE | IBCC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 2.10 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | 4.78 | +1.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCS2.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS2.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than IBCC.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS2.DE and IBCC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS2.DE | IBCC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -16.17% | -25.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.56% | -3.24% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.00% | -11.59% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.36% | -11.69% | -10.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.78% | -5.33% | -27.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.75% | -7.99% | -17.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 1.43% | -0.06% |
Volatility
XCS2.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) at 1.88%. This indicates that XCS2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBCC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS2.DE | IBCC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 1.88% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.40% | 4.35% | +3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.80% | 6.23% | +2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.13% | 7.57% | +2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 8.43% | +12.59% |
XCS2.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS2.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBCC.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCS2.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCS2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBCC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.99% | 4.63% | 6.49% | 4.14% | 0.47% | 0.09% | 1.39% | 1.22% |
XCS2.DE Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS2.DE and IBCC.DE have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCC.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCC.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XCS2.DE.
XCS2.DE tracks FTSE Australian Government Bond Index, while IBCC.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XCS2.DE and 0.07% for IBCC.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCS2.DE and IBCC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer