PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCS2.DE vs. EUN6.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCS2.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) and iShares € Govt Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EUN6.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCS2.DE achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than EUN6.DE's 1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, XCS2.DE has underperformed EUN6.DE with an annualized return of -0.09%, while EUN6.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 0.49% annualized return.


XCS2.DE

1D
0.64%
1M
0.17%
6M
8.57%
YTD
8.74%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
2.45%
5Y*
-1.91%
10Y*
-0.09%

EUN6.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.23%
6M
0.95%
YTD
1.02%
1Y
1.89%
3Y*
2.83%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
0.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCS2.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCS2.DE
Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
8.74%-2.17%-1.70%0.78%-13.88%-0.26%4.13%9.65%-0.82%-2.48%
EUN6.DE
iShares € Govt Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
1.02%2.16%3.57%2.74%-1.00%-0.70%-0.60%-0.54%-0.66%-0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between XCS2.DE and EUN6.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2010

0.07

The correlation between XCS2.DE and EUN6.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCS2.DE vs. EUN6.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCS2.DE
XCS2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XCS2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

EUN6.DE
EUN6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EUN6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCS2.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) and iShares € Govt Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EUN6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCS2.DEEUN6.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.98

-0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

5.84

-3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

22.30

-15.62

XCS2.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCS2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the EUN6.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCS2.DE and EUN6.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCS2.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCS2.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than EUN6.DE's maximum drawdown of -4.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS2.DE and EUN6.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCS2.DEEUN6.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.58%

-4.94%

-36.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.56%

-0.32%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.00%

-0.77%

-11.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.36%

-1.49%

-20.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.58%

-4.54%

-37.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.78%

-0.08%

-32.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.75%

-1.31%

-24.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

0.08%

+1.29%

Volatility

XCS2.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to iShares € Govt Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EUN6.DE) at 0.09%. This indicates that XCS2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUN6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCS2.DEEUN6.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

0.09%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.40%

0.57%

+6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

0.64%

+8.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.13%

0.67%

+9.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

0.63%

+20.39%

XCS2.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCS2.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EUN6.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XCS2.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Dividend Comparison

XCS2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUN6.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XCS2.DE and EUN6.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUN6.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUN6.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XCS2.DE.

XCS2.DE tracks FTSE Australian Government Bond Index, while EUN6.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Short Treasury (0-12 Month) Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XCS2.DE and 0.07% for EUN6.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCS2.DE and EUN6.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer