PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCS2.DE vs. EXVM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCS2.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) and iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXVM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCS2.DE achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than EXVM.DE's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, XCS2.DE has underperformed EXVM.DE with an annualized return of -0.09%, while EXVM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 0.29% annualized return.


XCS2.DE

1D
0.64%
1M
0.17%
6M
8.57%
YTD
8.74%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
2.45%
5Y*
-1.91%
10Y*
-0.09%

EXVM.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.21%
6M
0.92%
YTD
0.80%
1Y
1.68%
3Y*
2.62%
5Y*
1.43%
10Y*
0.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCS2.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCS2.DE
Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
8.74%-2.17%-1.70%0.78%-13.88%-0.26%4.13%9.65%-0.82%-2.48%
EXVM.DE
iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE)
0.80%2.06%3.37%2.36%-1.00%-0.83%-0.79%-0.80%-0.84%-0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between XCS2.DE and EXVM.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2010

0.07

The correlation between XCS2.DE and EXVM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCS2.DE vs. EXVM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCS2.DE
XCS2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XCS2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

EXVM.DE
EXVM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EXVM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXVM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXVM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
EXVM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXVM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCS2.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) and iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXVM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCS2.DEEXVM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.68

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

14.22

-12.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

54.84

-48.17

XCS2.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCS2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the EXVM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCS2.DE and EXVM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCS2.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCS2.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than EXVM.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS2.DE and EXVM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCS2.DEEXVM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.58%

-6.33%

-35.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.56%

-0.12%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.00%

-0.13%

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.36%

-1.65%

-20.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.58%

-5.65%

-35.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.78%

-0.01%

-32.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.75%

-1.76%

-23.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

0.03%

+1.34%

Volatility

XCS2.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS2.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXVM.DE) at 0.12%. This indicates that XCS2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXVM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCS2.DEEXVM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

0.12%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.40%

0.41%

+6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

0.54%

+8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.13%

0.51%

+9.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

0.79%

+20.23%

XCS2.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCS2.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EXVM.DE's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XCS2.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Dividend Comparison

XCS2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXVM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXVM.DE
iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE)
1.06%1.14%0.77%0.80%0.61%0.78%0.96%1.10%1.05%1.15%1.51%1.63%
XCS2.DE
Xtrackers II Australia Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCS2.DE and EXVM.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXVM.DE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXVM.DE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XCS2.DE.

XCS2.DE tracks FTSE Australian Government Bond Index, while EXVM.DE tracks eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XCS2.DE and 0.13% for EXVM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCS2.DE and EXVM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer