UECG vs. XDSQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UECG (Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UECG is passively managed, while XDSQ is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UECG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.

Performance

UECG vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF (UECG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UECG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -13.15%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDSQ

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.36%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 6M: 3.73%
• 1Y: 16.08%
• 3Y*: 15.08%
• 5Y*: 9.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UECG vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
UECG Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF	-41.37%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between UECG and XDSQ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026	0.48

Return for Risk

UECG vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 45
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UECG vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF (UECG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UECG	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.55	0.69	-1.24

Drawdowns

UECG vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UECG drawdown since its inception was -56.21%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UECG and XDSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	UECG	XDSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.21%	-26.06%	-30.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.37%	0.00%	-41.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.40%	-4.96%	-25.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UECG	XDSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.39%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	150.56%	10.54%	+140.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	150.56%	15.27%	+135.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	150.56%	15.09%	+135.47%

UECG vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UECG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

UECG vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither UECG nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UECG and XDSQ in my portfolio?

UECG and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UECG or XDSQ?

On fees, UECG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UECG or XDSQ?

UECG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UECG or XDSQ?

UECG and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UECG and XDSQ?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UECG and 0.79% for XDSQ.