UECG vs. OKTG
UECG (Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF) and OKTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. UECG is passively managed, while OKTG is actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
UECG vs. OKTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UECG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -13.15%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OKTG
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 126.83%
- YTD
- 55.43%
- 6M
- 55.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UECG vs. OKTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UECG Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF | -41.37% |
OKTG Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF | 54.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between UECG and OKTG is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UECG vs. OKTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF (UECG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UECG | OKTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.55 | 1.26 | -1.80 |
Drawdowns
UECG vs. OKTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UECG drawdown since its inception was -56.21%, smaller than the maximum OKTG drawdown of -60.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UECG and OKTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UECG | OKTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.21% | -60.69% | +4.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.37% | -23.19% | -18.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.40% | -23.37% | -7.03% |
Volatility
UECG vs. OKTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UECG | OKTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 150.56% | 137.13% | +13.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 150.56% | 137.13% | +13.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 150.56% | 137.13% | +13.43% |
UECG vs. OKTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UECG and OKTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
UECG vs. OKTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither UECG nor OKTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UECG and OKTG have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UECG and OKTG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
UECG and OKTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for UECG and OKTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer