UECG vs. LINT
UECG (Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UECG is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UECG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
UECG vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UECG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -13.15%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LINT
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 549.02%
- 6M
- 433.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UECG vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UECG Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF | -41.37% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 349.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between UECG and LINT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UECG vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF (UECG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UECG | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.55 | 22.52 | -23.06 |
Drawdowns
UECG vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UECG drawdown since its inception was -56.21%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UECG and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UECG | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.21% | -49.54% | -6.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.37% | -28.08% | -13.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.40% | -20.57% | -9.83% |
Volatility
UECG vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UECG | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 150.56% | 162.52% | -11.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 150.56% | 162.52% | -11.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 150.56% | 162.52% | -11.96% |
UECG vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
UECG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
UECG vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
UECG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.13% | 0.25% |
UECG Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UECG and LINT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UECG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UECG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for UECG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UECG and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for UECG and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer