PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDOW vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UDOW vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UDOW vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
-13.10%24.46%28.47%32.72%-32.39%30.60%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
-4.89%14.22%23.12%23.00%-16.78%12.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a -13.10% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's -4.89% return.


UDOW

1D
7.38%
1M
-16.17%
YTD
-13.10%
6M
-5.67%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
20.30%

XDSQ

1D
2.74%
1M
-6.22%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UDOW vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UDOW vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDOW
UDOW Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
UDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
UDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDOW vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDOWXDSQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.32

0.77

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.81

1.22

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.20

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.19

-0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.13

5.87

-3.75

UDOW vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDOW and XDSQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDOWXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.77

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.60

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between UDOW and XDSQ is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UDOW vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
1.56%1.38%0.95%0.95%0.83%0.26%0.19%0.61%0.73%0.13%0.26%0.21%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UDOW vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and XDSQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UDOWXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.29%

-26.06%

-54.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.18%

-12.18%

-18.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.46%

-7.12%

-15.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.46%

-5.08%

-9.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.21%

2.47%

+6.74%

Volatility

UDOW vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 5.65%. This indicates that UDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UDOWXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.74%

5.65%

+9.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.64%

9.60%

+18.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.20%

17.99%

+32.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.05%

15.32%

+28.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.68%

15.32%

+36.36%