PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDOW vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDOW vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 18.09% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 51.24% return. Over the past 10 years, UDOW has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 22.44%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.05% annualized return.


UDOW

1D
-1.73%
1M
0.98%
6M
9.75%
YTD
18.09%
1Y
44.27%
3Y*
30.32%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
22.44%
ALL TIME*
26.13%

TNA

1D
-1.80%
1M
-4.08%
6M
21.21%
YTD
51.24%
1Y
90.40%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
-4.03%
10Y*
7.05%
ALL TIME*
14.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDOW vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
18.09%24.46%28.47%32.72%-32.39%65.67%-17.15%75.24%-23.86%99.07%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
51.24%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between UDOW and TNA is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.80

The correlation between UDOW and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

UDOW vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDOW
TNA

Financial Services

31.9%
17.5%

Industrials

8.9%
14.2%

Technology

8.4%
14.8%

Healthcare

6.7%
20.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
9.2%

Communication Services

2.8%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
2.6%

Basic Materials

2.0%
4.4%

Energy

1.1%
5.5%

Real Estate

-

6.6%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Financial Services

UDOW
31.9%
TNA
17.5%

Industrials

UDOW
8.9%
TNA
14.2%

Technology

UDOW
8.4%
TNA
14.8%

Healthcare

UDOW
6.7%
TNA
20.3%

Consumer Cyclical

UDOW
5.3%
TNA
9.2%

Communication Services

UDOW
2.8%
TNA
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

UDOW
2.0%
TNA
2.6%

Basic Materials

UDOW
2.0%
TNA
4.4%

Energy

UDOW
1.1%
TNA
5.5%

Real Estate

UDOW

-

TNA
6.6%

Utilities

UDOW

-

TNA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDOW vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDOW
UDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
UDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
UDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDOW vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UDOWTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

2.79

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

9.13

-3.53

UDOW vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDOW and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UDOW vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDOWTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.29%

-88.09%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.07%

-32.53%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.83%

-65.78%

+20.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.79%

-82.36%

+26.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.29%

-88.09%

+7.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.09%

-36.04%

+28.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.30%

-33.92%

+19.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.92%

9.93%

-2.01%

Volatility

UDOW vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) is 6.63%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 10.85%. This indicates that UDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDOWTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

10.85%

-4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.77%

42.27%

-13.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.65%

57.77%

-21.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.17%

67.24%

-23.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.70%

68.33%

-16.63%

UDOW vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDOW vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than TNA's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.31%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%0.00%0.00%
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
1.14%1.38%0.95%0.95%0.83%0.26%0.19%0.61%0.73%0.13%0.26%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDOW and TNA have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNA has higher volatility (10.85%) compared to UDOW (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, UDOW leads with 22.44% vs 7.05% for TNA. On fees, UDOW is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UDOW has been the lower-risk option at 6.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UDOW has performed better with a 22.44% return vs 7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDOW is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

UDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.31% for TNA.

UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UDOW and 1.05% for TNA.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDOW and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer