PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDOW vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDOW vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, UDOW has outperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 23.30%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 21.94% annualized return.


UDOW

1D
-3.38%
1M
10.84%
YTD
12.27%
6M
12.78%
1Y
53.13%
3Y*
33.01%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
23.30%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDOW vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
12.27%24.46%28.47%32.72%-32.39%65.67%-17.15%75.24%-23.86%99.07%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between UDOW and QQQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.75

The correlation between UDOW and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UDOW vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDOW
QQQ

Financial Services

27.2%
0.2%

Industrials

18.4%
2.8%

Technology

17.1%
53.8%

Healthcare

13.1%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
7.7%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.1%

Energy

2.4%
0.6%

Communication Services

1.9%
15.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

UDOW
27.2%
QQQ
0.2%

Industrials

UDOW
18.4%
QQQ
2.8%

Technology

UDOW
17.1%
QQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

UDOW
13.1%
QQQ
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

UDOW
11.6%
QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

UDOW
4.4%
QQQ
7.7%

Basic Materials

UDOW
4.0%
QQQ
1.1%

Energy

UDOW
2.4%
QQQ
0.6%

Communication Services

UDOW
1.9%
QQQ
15.8%

Real Estate

UDOW

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

UDOW

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDOW vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDOW
UDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
UDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDOW vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDOWQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.51

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

13.49

-6.74

UDOW vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDOW and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDOWQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.64

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.81

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.99

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.41

+0.12

Drawdowns

UDOW vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDOWQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.29%

-82.97%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.07%

-11.96%

-16.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.83%

-22.77%

-22.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.79%

-35.12%

-20.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.29%

-35.12%

-45.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

-0.26%

-3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.39%

-32.79%

+18.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.90%

3.11%

+4.79%

Volatility

UDOW vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that UDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDOWQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

4.49%

+4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.61%

12.10%

+15.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.12%

15.94%

+20.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.19%

22.38%

+21.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.76%

22.29%

+29.47%

UDOW vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDOW vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
1.21%1.38%0.95%0.95%0.83%0.26%0.19%0.61%0.73%0.13%0.26%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDOW and QQQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UDOW has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, UDOW leads with 23.30% vs 21.94% for QQQ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UDOW has performed better with a 23.30% return vs 21.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UDOW.

UDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

UDOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UDOW and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDOW and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer