UDOW vs. NRGU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

UDOW (ProShares UltraPro Dow30) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UDOW tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%) while NRGU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UDOW returned 51.98% vs 107.84% for NRGU. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

UDOW vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 110.06% return.

UDOW

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: 8.49%
• YTD: 14.65%
• 6M: 11.42%
• 1Y: 51.98%
• 3Y*: 32.31%
• 5Y*: 13.79%
• 10Y*: 23.82%

NRGU

• 1D: 2.51%
• 1M: 2.05%
• YTD: 110.06%
• 6M: 87.26%
• 1Y: 107.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDOW vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30	14.65%	9.61%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	110.06%	-30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between UDOW and NRGU is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.09

The correlation between UDOW and NRGU shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UDOW vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UDOW	NRGU
Financial Services	27.2%	-
Industrials	18.4%	-
Technology	17.1%	-
Healthcare	13.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	-
Basic Materials	4.0%	-
Energy	2.4%	100.0%
Communication Services	1.9%	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

UDOW vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDOW

UDOW Risk / Return Rank: 44
UDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
UDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
UDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 41
UDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
UDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 45

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 48
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 43
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDOW vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UDOW	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.44	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	1.98	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.24	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	2.71	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.59	6.55	+0.05

UDOW vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDOW and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UDOW vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	UDOW	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.29%	-57.50%	-22.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.07%	-39.95%	+11.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-27.55%	+24.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.37%	-25.35%	+10.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.94%	16.54%	-8.60%

Volatility

UDOW vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) is 12.92%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 27.12%. This indicates that UDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UDOW	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.92%	27.12%	-14.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.12%	62.47%	-33.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.38%	75.30%	-37.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.39%	88.96%	-44.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.84%	88.96%	-37.12%

UDOW vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UDOW and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

UDOW vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30	1.18%	1.38%	0.95%	0.95%	0.83%	0.26%	0.19%	0.61%	0.73%	0.13%	0.26%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UDOW and NRGU in my portfolio?

UDOW and NRGU have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UDOW or NRGU?

NRGU has higher volatility (27.12%) compared to UDOW (12.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

Which ETF is better, UDOW or NRGU?

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 107.84% vs 51.98% for UDOW. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UDOW has been the lower-risk option at 12.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UDOW or NRGU?

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 107.84% return vs 51.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UDOW or NRGU?

UDOW and NRGU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UDOW or NRGU?

UDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between UDOW and NRGU?

UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%), while NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and BMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.