PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDOW vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDOW vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 936.32% return.


UDOW

1D
-3.38%
1M
10.84%
YTD
12.27%
6M
12.78%
1Y
53.13%
3Y*
33.01%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
23.30%

ARMG

1D
4.85%
1M
261.28%
YTD
936.32%
6M
526.62%
1Y
510.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDOW vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
12.27%25.40%
ARMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF
936.32%-61.80%

Correlation

The correlation between UDOW and ARMG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDOW vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDOW
UDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
UDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDOW vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDOWARMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.46

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

7.56

-5.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

13.34

-6.59

UDOW vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the ARMG Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDOW and ARMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDOWARMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

3.96

-2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.24

-0.71

Drawdowns

UDOW vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, roughly equal to the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and ARMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDOWARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.29%

-80.28%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.07%

-68.13%

+40.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

0.00%

-3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.39%

-53.04%

+38.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.90%

38.55%

-30.65%

Volatility

UDOW vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) is 8.80%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 64.57%. This indicates that UDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDOWARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

64.57%

-55.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.61%

103.90%

-76.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.12%

130.31%

-94.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.19%

138.30%

-94.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.76%

138.30%

-86.54%

UDOW vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDOW vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than ARMG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF
0.47%4.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
1.21%1.38%0.95%0.95%0.83%0.26%0.19%0.61%0.73%0.13%0.26%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDOW and ARMG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARMG has higher volatility (64.57%) compared to UDOW (8.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs ARMG's -80.28%.

On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 510.84% vs 53.13% for UDOW. On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UDOW has been the lower-risk option at 8.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 510.84% return vs 53.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UDOW.

UDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.47% for ARMG.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UDOW and 0.75% for ARMG.

ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDOW and ARMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer