UD03.L vs. UC15.L
UD03.L (UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UD03.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UD03.L returned 10.72%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for UC15.L. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. UD03.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC15.L.
Performance
UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UD03.L achieves a 12.28% return, which is significantly lower than UC15.L's 21.49% return.
UD03.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 12.28%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
UC15.L
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 21.49%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 32.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 12.28% | 25.20% | 0.78% | 19.24% | -4.62% | 10.81% | 5.72% | 0.00% |
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.49% | 2.57% | 6.44% | -6.52% | 29.97% | 36.11% | -2.49% | 2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between UD03.L and UC15.L is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019 | -0.05 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between UD03.L and UC15.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UD03.L
UC15.L
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
UD03.L
UC15.L
Technology
UD03.L
UC15.L
Consumer Defensive
UD03.L
UC15.L
Industrials
UD03.L
UC15.L
Utilities
UD03.L
UC15.L
Consumer Cyclical
UD03.L
UC15.L
Basic Materials
UD03.L
UC15.L
Healthcare
UD03.L
UC15.L
Communication Services
UD03.L
UC15.L
Energy
UD03.L
UC15.L
Real Estate
UD03.L
-
UC15.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UD03.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank
UD03.L
UC15.L
UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UD03.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.39 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 5.23 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.25 | 13.93 | +2.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UD03.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47 | 2.12 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.75 | 0.87 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.33 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UD03.L drawdown since its inception was -30.85%, smaller than the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -42.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD03.L and UC15.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UD03.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.85% | -42.93% | +12.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.80% | -6.18% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.72% | -13.98% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.67% | -17.43% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -3.53% | +2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -15.17% | +11.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 2.32% | +1.24% |
Volatility
UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) is 3.58%, while UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that UD03.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UD03.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 5.07% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 15.26% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.46% | 14.69% | +12.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.29% | 14.80% | +32.49% |
UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UD03.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison
UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while UC15.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 2.54% | 2.97% | 2.84% | 3.67% | 3.96% | 3.50% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UD03.L and UC15.L have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UD03.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UD03.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.
UD03.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while UC15.L is Commodities. UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for UD03.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.
Find the right allocation for UD03.L and UC15.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer