PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UD03.L vs. UC15.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UD03.L achieves a 12.28% return, which is significantly lower than UC15.L's 21.49% return.


UD03.L

1D
0.26%
1M
4.71%
YTD
12.28%
6M
15.08%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*

UC15.L

1D
-1.31%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
21.49%
6M
22.05%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
10.32%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
12.28%25.20%0.78%19.24%-4.62%10.81%5.72%0.00%
UC15.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
21.49%2.57%6.44%-6.52%29.97%36.11%-2.49%2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between UD03.L and UC15.L is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

-0.05

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between UD03.L and UC15.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UD03.L
UC15.L

Financial Services

28.5%
10.9%

Technology

16.2%
31.0%

Consumer Defensive

14.6%
3.7%

Industrials

12.1%
6.6%

Utilities

7.7%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
7.3%

Basic Materials

4.2%
0.5%

Healthcare

4.1%
9.8%

Communication Services

3.1%
15.0%

Energy

2.7%
14.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

UD03.L
28.5%
UC15.L
10.9%

Technology

UD03.L
16.2%
UC15.L
31.0%

Consumer Defensive

UD03.L
14.6%
UC15.L
3.7%

Industrials

UD03.L
12.1%
UC15.L
6.6%

Utilities

UD03.L
7.7%
UC15.L
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

UD03.L
7.0%
UC15.L
7.3%

Basic Materials

UD03.L
4.2%
UC15.L
0.5%

Healthcare

UD03.L
4.1%
UC15.L
9.8%

Communication Services

UD03.L
3.1%
UC15.L
15.0%

Energy

UD03.L
2.7%
UC15.L
14.2%

Real Estate

UD03.L

-

UC15.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UD03.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

UC15.L
UC15.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
UC15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
UC15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UD03.LUC15.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.39

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

5.23

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.25

13.93

+2.32

UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UD03.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is higher than the UC15.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UD03.L and UC15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UD03.LUC15.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47

2.12

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.75

0.87

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.33

+0.86

Drawdowns

UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UD03.L drawdown since its inception was -30.85%, smaller than the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -42.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD03.L and UC15.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UD03.LUC15.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.85%

-42.93%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-6.18%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.72%

-13.98%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.67%

-17.43%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-3.53%

+2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-15.17%

+11.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.32%

+1.24%

Volatility

UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) is 3.58%, while UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that UD03.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UD03.LUC15.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

5.07%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

15.26%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.46%

14.69%

+12.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.29%

14.80%

+32.49%

UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UD03.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

UD03.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison

UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while UC15.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
UC15.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.54%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


UD03.L and UC15.L have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UD03.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UD03.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.

UD03.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while UC15.L is Commodities. UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for UD03.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UD03.L and UC15.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer