PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UD03.L vs. IEDL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UD03.L vs. IEDL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UD03.L is traded in GBp, while IEDL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEDL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UD03.L achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than IEDL.L's 13.18% return.


UD03.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.74%
YTD
11.99%
6M
14.95%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*

IEDL.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
4.12%
YTD
13.18%
6M
16.80%
1Y
37.03%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UD03.L vs. IEDL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
11.99%25.20%0.78%19.24%-4.62%10.81%5.72%0.00%
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
13.18%42.22%5.44%11.24%1.22%19.20%-3.60%0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between UD03.L and IEDL.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.26

Over the past year, UD03.L and IEDL.L have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

UD03.L vs. IEDL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UD03.L
IEDL.L

Financial Services

28.5%
22.6%

Technology

16.2%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

14.6%
8.6%

Industrials

12.1%
17.0%

Utilities

7.7%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
6.2%

Basic Materials

4.2%
6.2%

Healthcare

4.1%
12.3%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.7%

Energy

2.7%
5.1%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Financial Services

UD03.L
28.5%
IEDL.L
22.6%

Technology

UD03.L
16.2%
IEDL.L
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

UD03.L
14.6%
IEDL.L
8.6%

Industrials

UD03.L
12.1%
IEDL.L
17.0%

Utilities

UD03.L
7.7%
IEDL.L
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UD03.L
7.0%
IEDL.L
6.2%

Basic Materials

UD03.L
4.2%
IEDL.L
6.2%

Healthcare

UD03.L
4.1%
IEDL.L
12.3%

Communication Services

UD03.L
3.1%
IEDL.L
3.7%

Energy

UD03.L
2.7%
IEDL.L
5.1%

Real Estate

UD03.L

-

IEDL.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UD03.L vs. IEDL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IEDL.L
IEDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UD03.L vs. IEDL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UD03.LIEDL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.49

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.67

3.50

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.11

12.94

+3.17

UD03.L vs. IEDL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UD03.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is comparable to the IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UD03.L and IEDL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UD03.LIEDL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44

2.74

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.74

0.96

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.59

+0.60

Drawdowns

UD03.L vs. IEDL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UD03.L drawdown since its inception was -30.85%, smaller than the maximum IEDL.L drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD03.L and IEDL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UD03.LIEDL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.85%

-34.37%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-10.54%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.72%

-16.23%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.67%

-16.28%

-2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-0.69%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-5.72%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.85%

+0.71%

Volatility

UD03.L vs. IEDL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) is 3.69%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that UD03.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEDL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UD03.LIEDL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

4.79%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

13.47%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.51%

15.30%

+12.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.36%

17.60%

+29.76%

UD03.L vs. IEDL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UD03.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IEDL.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

UD03.L vs. IEDL.L - Dividend Comparison

UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than IEDL.L's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.01%3.44%4.22%4.76%4.23%3.56%2.32%3.86%3.19%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.55%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UD03.L and IEDL.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEDL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEDL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD03.L.

UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while IEDL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for UD03.L and 0.25% for IEDL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UD03.L and IEDL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer