PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCYB vs. UVXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UCYB vs. UVXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCYB achieves a 56.37% return, which is significantly higher than UVXY's -34.93% return.


UCYB

1D
-3.58%
1M
15.43%
6M
52.68%
YTD
56.37%
1Y
43.09%
3Y*
42.20%
5Y*
15.75%
10Y*

UVXY

1D
2.95%
1M
-9.52%
6M
-33.79%
YTD
-34.93%
1Y
-73.19%
3Y*
-62.17%
5Y*
-68.33%
10Y*
-72.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCYB vs. UVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UCYB
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity
56.37%9.41%28.84%68.85%-55.15%27.53%
UVXY
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
-34.93%-65.32%-50.90%-87.70%-44.81%-87.73%

Correlation

The correlation between UCYB and UVXY is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021

-0.51

The correlation between UCYB and UVXY shifts across timeframes, from -0.51 (5 years) to -0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCYB vs. UVXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCYB
UCYB Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
UCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
UCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

UVXY
UVXY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
UVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
UVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCYB vs. UVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UCYBUVXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.82

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

-0.99

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.19

-1.48

+3.67

UCYB vs. UVXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCYB Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the UVXY Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCYB and UVXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UCYB vs. UVXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCYB drawdown since its inception was -62.69%, smaller than the maximum UVXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCYB and UVXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCYBUVXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.69%

-100.00%

+37.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.04%

-73.88%

+30.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.04%

-95.42%

+52.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.69%

-99.75%

+37.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-100.00%

+95.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.20%

-98.76%

+71.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.74%

49.56%

-29.82%

Volatility

UCYB vs. UVXY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) is 15.30%, while ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that UCYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCYBUVXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.30%

17.16%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.42%

66.78%

-21.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.94%

85.47%

-33.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.59%

103.82%

-53.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.86%

112.00%

-62.14%

UCYB vs. UVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCYB has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than UVXY's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

UCYB vs. UVXY - Dividend Comparison

UCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, while UVXY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
UCYB
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity
1.48%1.90%2.16%0.56%0.00%0.91%
UVXY
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UCYB and UVXY have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UVXY has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to UCYB (15.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCYB dropped -62.69% vs UVXY's -100.00%.

On 5-year performance, UCYB leads with 15.75% vs -68.33% for UVXY. On fees, UVXY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UCYB has been the lower-risk option at 15.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UCYB has performed better with a 15.75% return vs -68.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UVXY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UCYB.

UCYB has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.00% for UVXY.

UCYB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UVXY is Volatility. UCYB tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index (200%), while UVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UCYB and 0.95% for UVXY.

UCYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCYB and UVXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer