UCYB vs. WCBR
UCYB (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity) and WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - UCYB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index (200%), while WCBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UCYB returned 18.13%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for WCBR. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UCYB charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WCBR.
Performance
UCYB vs. WCBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCYB achieves a 51.10% return, which is significantly higher than WCBR's 25.14% return.
UCYB
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 61.03%
- YTD
- 51.10%
- 6M
- 38.20%
- 1Y
- 37.94%
- 3Y*
- 43.47%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- —
WCBR
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 25.44%
- YTD
- 25.14%
- 6M
- 18.78%
- 1Y
- 11.73%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- —
UCYB vs. WCBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCYB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity | 51.10% | 9.41% | 28.84% | 68.85% | -55.15% | 34.16% |
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund | 25.14% | -1.44% | 11.42% | 66.63% | -41.96% | 6.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCYB and WCBR is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between UCYB and WCBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
UCYB vs. WCBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UCYB
WCBR
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
UCYB
WCBR
Industrials
UCYB
WCBR
-
Communication Services
UCYB
WCBR
-
Basic Materials
UCYB
-
WCBR
-
Consumer Cyclical
UCYB
-
WCBR
-
Consumer Defensive
UCYB
-
WCBR
-
Energy
UCYB
-
WCBR
-
Financial Services
UCYB
-
WCBR
-
Healthcare
UCYB
-
WCBR
-
Real Estate
UCYB
-
WCBR
-
Utilities
UCYB
-
WCBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCYB vs. WCBR — Risk / Return Rank
UCYB
WCBR
UCYB vs. WCBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCYB | WCBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.09 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 0.39 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.97 | 0.90 | +1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCYB | WCBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.37 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.28 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.20 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
UCYB vs. WCBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCYB drawdown since its inception was -62.69%, which is greater than WCBR's maximum drawdown of -52.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCYB and WCBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCYB | WCBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.69% | -52.25% | -10.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.04% | -29.92% | -13.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.04% | -30.27% | -12.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.69% | -52.25% | -10.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.02% | -5.82% | -2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.47% | -20.35% | -7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.33% | 13.04% | +6.29% |
Volatility
UCYB vs. WCBR - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) has a higher volatility of 22.45% compared to WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) at 13.74%. This indicates that UCYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WCBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCYB | WCBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.45% | 13.74% | +8.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.18% | 27.29% | +14.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.53% | 32.18% | +17.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.95% | 33.61% | +16.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.63% | 33.58% | +16.05% |
UCYB vs. WCBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCYB has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than WCBR's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
UCYB vs. WCBR - Dividend Comparison
UCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCYB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity | 1.43% | 1.90% | 2.16% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.91% |
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCYB and WCBR have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCYB has higher volatility (22.45%) compared to WCBR (13.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCYB dropped -62.69% vs WCBR's -52.25%.
On 5-year performance, UCYB leads with 18.13% vs 9.52% for WCBR. On fees, WCBR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, WCBR has been the lower-risk option at 13.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UCYB has performed better with a 18.13% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WCBR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UCYB.
UCYB has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for WCBR.
UCYB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WCBR is Technology Equities. UCYB tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index (200%), while WCBR tracks WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UCYB and 0.45% for WCBR.
UCYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCYB and WCBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer