PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCYB vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UCYB vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCYB achieves a 54.17% return, which is significantly higher than SPUU's 19.82% return.


UCYB

1D
-5.91%
1M
69.42%
YTD
54.17%
6M
42.88%
1Y
40.41%
3Y*
44.52%
5Y*
18.61%
10Y*

SPUU

1D
-1.27%
1M
10.01%
YTD
19.82%
6M
19.11%
1Y
53.61%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
20.19%
10Y*
24.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCYB vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UCYB
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity
54.17%9.41%28.84%68.85%-55.15%29.50%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
19.82%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%52.74%

Correlation

The correlation between UCYB and SPUU is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021

0.70

The correlation between UCYB and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UCYB vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UCYB
SPUU

Technology

95.1%
16.5%

Industrials

4.8%
3.3%

Communication Services

0.1%
4.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Energy

-

1.4%

Financial Services

-

4.8%

Healthcare

-

3.6%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Technology

UCYB
95.1%
SPUU
16.5%

Industrials

UCYB
4.8%
SPUU
3.3%

Communication Services

UCYB
0.1%
SPUU
4.6%

Basic Materials

UCYB

-

SPUU
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

UCYB

-

SPUU
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

UCYB

-

SPUU
2.0%

Energy

UCYB

-

SPUU
1.4%

Financial Services

UCYB

-

SPUU
4.8%

Healthcare

UCYB

-

SPUU
3.6%

Real Estate

UCYB

-

SPUU
0.8%

Utilities

UCYB

-

SPUU
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCYB vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCYB
UCYB Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
UCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
UCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCYB vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCYBSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

2.96

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.10

13.06

-10.96

UCYB vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCYB Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCYB and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCYBSPUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

2.26

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.61

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.63

-0.33

Drawdowns

UCYB vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCYB drawdown since its inception was -62.69%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCYB and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCYBSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.69%

-59.35%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.04%

-18.19%

-24.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.04%

-35.18%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.69%

-46.59%

-16.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.15%

-1.27%

-4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.48%

-9.51%

-17.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.32%

4.12%

+15.20%

Volatility

UCYB vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) has a higher volatility of 22.00% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) at 5.71%. This indicates that UCYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCYBSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.00%

5.71%

+16.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.13%

18.09%

+24.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.49%

23.90%

+25.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.95%

33.46%

+16.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.64%

35.77%

+13.87%

UCYB vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCYB has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

UCYB vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

UCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than SPUU's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
1.34%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%
UCYB
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity
1.41%1.90%2.16%0.56%0.00%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UCYB and SPUU have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UCYB has higher volatility (22.00%) compared to SPUU (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCYB dropped -62.69% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 5-year performance, SPUU leads with 20.19% vs 18.61% for UCYB. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 20.19% return vs 18.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UCYB.

UCYB has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 1.34% for SPUU.

UCYB tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index (200%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UCYB and 0.64% for SPUU.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCYB and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer