UCYB vs. SPUU
UCYB (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UCYB tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index (200%) while SPUU tracks the S&P 500 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UCYB returned 18.61%/yr vs 20.19%/yr for SPUU. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UCYB charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
UCYB vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCYB achieves a 54.17% return, which is significantly higher than SPUU's 19.82% return.
UCYB
- 1D
- -5.91%
- 1M
- 69.42%
- YTD
- 54.17%
- 6M
- 42.88%
- 1Y
- 40.41%
- 3Y*
- 44.52%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 53.61%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.19%
- 10Y*
- 24.77%
UCYB vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCYB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity | 54.17% | 9.41% | 28.84% | 68.85% | -55.15% | 29.50% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 19.82% | 26.55% | 44.25% | 47.28% | -38.72% | 52.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCYB and SPUU is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021 | 0.70 |
The correlation between UCYB and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UCYB vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UCYB
SPUU
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
UCYB
SPUU
Industrials
UCYB
SPUU
Communication Services
UCYB
SPUU
Basic Materials
UCYB
-
SPUU
Consumer Cyclical
UCYB
-
SPUU
Consumer Defensive
UCYB
-
SPUU
Energy
UCYB
-
SPUU
Financial Services
UCYB
-
SPUU
Healthcare
UCYB
-
SPUU
Real Estate
UCYB
-
SPUU
Utilities
UCYB
-
SPUU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCYB vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
UCYB
SPUU
UCYB vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCYB | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.38 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 2.96 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | 13.06 | -10.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCYB | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 2.26 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.61 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.63 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
UCYB vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCYB drawdown since its inception was -62.69%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCYB and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCYB | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.69% | -59.35% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.04% | -18.19% | -24.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.04% | -35.18% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.69% | -46.59% | -16.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.15% | -1.27% | -4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.48% | -9.51% | -17.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.32% | 4.12% | +15.20% |
Volatility
UCYB vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) has a higher volatility of 22.00% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) at 5.71%. This indicates that UCYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCYB | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.00% | 5.71% | +16.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.13% | 18.09% | +24.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.49% | 23.90% | +25.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.95% | 33.46% | +16.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.64% | 35.77% | +13.87% |
UCYB vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCYB has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
UCYB vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
UCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than SPUU's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 1.34% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
UCYB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity | 1.41% | 1.90% | 2.16% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCYB and SPUU have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCYB has higher volatility (22.00%) compared to SPUU (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCYB dropped -62.69% vs SPUU's -59.35%.
On 5-year performance, SPUU leads with 20.19% vs 18.61% for UCYB. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 20.19% return vs 18.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UCYB.
UCYB has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 1.34% for SPUU.
UCYB tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index (200%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UCYB and 0.64% for SPUU.
SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCYB and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer