UCYB vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

UCYB (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UCYB is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UCYB returned 36.10%/yr vs 19.04%/yr for QTJL. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UCYB charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

UCYB vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCYB achieves a 27.14% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.41% return.

UCYB

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -3.95%
• YTD: 27.14%
• 6M: 21.84%
• 1Y: 12.91%
• 3Y*: 36.10%
• 5Y*: 10.93%
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 7.41%
• 6M: 6.99%
• 1Y: 18.39%
• 3Y*: 19.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCYB vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
UCYB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity	27.14%	9.41%	28.84%	68.85%	-55.15%	26.39%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.41%	21.07%	16.50%	42.39%	-30.16%	9.36%

Correlation

The correlation between UCYB and QTJL is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.70

The correlation between UCYB and QTJL shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UCYB vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UCYB	QTJL
Technology	95.1%	58.0%
Industrials	4.8%	2.6%
Communication Services	0.1%	14.5%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.6%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

UCYB vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCYB

UCYB Risk / Return Rank: 13
UCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
UCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
UCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 14
UCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
UCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 12

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 71
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCYB vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UCYB	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	1.87	-1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	2.68	-1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.39	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	2.76	-2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.65	14.56	-13.91

UCYB vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCYB Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCYB and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UCYB vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCYB drawdown since its inception was -62.69%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCYB and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	UCYB	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.69%	-33.40%	-29.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.04%	-6.68%	-36.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.04%	-22.43%	-20.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.60%	-0.01%	-22.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.38%	-7.84%	-19.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.92%	1.27%	+18.65%

Volatility

UCYB vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) has a higher volatility of 24.42% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.59%. This indicates that UCYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UCYB	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.42%	0.59%	+23.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.72%	7.37%	+36.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.88%	9.86%	+41.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.24%	20.29%	+29.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.71%	20.29%	+29.42%

UCYB vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCYB has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

UCYB vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

UCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UCYB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity	1.82%	1.90%	2.16%	0.56%	0.00%	0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UCYB and QTJL in my portfolio?

UCYB and QTJL have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UCYB or QTJL?

UCYB has higher volatility (24.42%) compared to QTJL (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCYB dropped -62.69% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, UCYB or QTJL?

On 3-year performance, UCYB leads with 36.10% vs 19.04% for QTJL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UCYB or QTJL?

Over the 3-year period, UCYB has performed better with a 36.10% return vs 19.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UCYB or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UCYB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UCYB or QTJL?

UCYB has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

What is the main difference between UCYB and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UCYB and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.