UCYB vs. QTAP
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP).
UCYB and QTAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UCYB is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 19, 2021. QTAP is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
UCYB vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UCYB vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCYB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity | -24.17% | 9.41% | 28.84% | 68.85% | -55.15% | 53.14% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 3.02% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 43.32% | -25.87% | 15.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCYB achieves a -24.17% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 3.02% return.
UCYB
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -24.17%
- 6M
- -35.38%
- 1Y
- -12.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 21.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UCYB vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCYB has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UCYB vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
UCYB
QTAP
UCYB vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCYB | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | 1.29 | -1.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | 2.05 | -2.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.50 | -0.51 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 1.81 | -2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 12.95 | -13.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCYB | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 1.29 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.64 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between UCYB and QTAP is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
UCYB vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
UCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCYB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity | 2.86% | 1.90% | 2.16% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.91% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UCYB vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCYB drawdown since its inception was -62.69%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCYB and QTAP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCYB | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.69% | -29.44% | -33.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.54% | -12.04% | -30.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.91% | 0.00% | -37.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.72% | -5.21% | -22.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.66% | 1.68% | +14.98% |
Volatility
UCYB vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) has a higher volatility of 14.49% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.88%. This indicates that UCYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UCYB | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.49% | 1.88% | +12.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.19% | 3.23% | +29.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.93% | 16.38% | +32.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.30% | 19.03% | +29.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.51% | 19.03% | +29.48% |