PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCYB vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UCYB vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UCYB vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UCYB
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity
-21.89%9.41%22.49%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-48.47%-37.07%37.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCYB achieves a -21.89% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -48.47% return.


UCYB

1D
3.00%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
-21.89%
6M
-33.52%
1Y
-3.96%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*

BITU

1D
-3.41%
1M
-18.04%
YTD
-48.47%
6M
-75.98%
1Y
-53.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UCYB vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCYB has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UCYB vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCYB
UCYB Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
UCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
UCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCYB vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCYBBITUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.26

-0.65

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.04

-0.72

+0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.92

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

-0.73

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.60

-1.39

+0.79

UCYB vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCYB Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCYB and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCYBBITUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

-0.65

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

-0.33

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between UCYB and BITU is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UCYB vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

UCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than BITU's 80.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
UCYB
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity
2.78%1.90%2.16%0.56%0.00%0.91%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
80.83%50.23%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UCYB vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCYB drawdown since its inception was -62.69%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -77.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCYB and BITU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UCYBBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.69%

-77.76%

+15.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.54%

-77.76%

+35.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.04%

-76.95%

+40.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.73%

-31.45%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.81%

40.79%

-23.98%

Volatility

UCYB vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) is 14.59%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 21.92%. This indicates that UCYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UCYBBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.59%

21.92%

-7.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.31%

73.90%

-40.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.99%

90.15%

-41.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.30%

99.50%

-51.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.51%

99.50%

-50.99%