UCTT vs. GWW
UCTT (Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.) and GWW (W.W. Grainger, Inc.) are both stocks. UCTT operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while GWW operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, UCTT returned 34.35%/yr vs 21.80%/yr for GWW. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UCTT vs. GWW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCTT achieves a 328.03% return, which is significantly higher than GWW's 33.57% return. Over the past 10 years, UCTT has outperformed GWW with an annualized return of 34.35%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively lower 21.80% annualized return.
UCTT
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- 29.06%
- YTD
- 328.03%
- 6M
- 314.13%
- 1Y
- 382.51%
- 3Y*
- 44.16%
- 5Y*
- 15.44%
- 10Y*
- 34.35%
GWW
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 33.57%
- 6M
- 30.76%
- 1Y
- 30.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.13%
- 5Y*
- 26.12%
- 10Y*
- 21.80%
UCTT vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCTT Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. | 328.03% | -29.54% | 5.30% | 2.99% | -42.21% | 84.14% | 32.72% | 177.10% | -63.32% | 138.04% |
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 33.57% | -3.41% | 28.21% | 50.53% | 8.75% | 28.80% | 22.85% | 22.25% | 21.69% | 4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCTT and GWW is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2004 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
UCTT:
$4.91B
GWW:
$63.64B
UCTT:
-$4.28
GWW:
$37.26
UCTT:
2.37
GWW:
3.49
UCTT:
7.82
GWW:
16.19
UCTT:
$2.07B
GWW:
$18.38B
UCTT:
$323.40M
GWW:
$7.20B
UCTT:
-$53.90M
GWW:
$2.82B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCTT vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank
UCTT
GWW
UCTT vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCTT | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.24 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.96 | 2.26 | +10.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.44 | 4.63 | +31.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCTT vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCTT drawdown since its inception was -95.20%, which is greater than GWW's maximum drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCTT and GWW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCTT | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.20% | -56.73% | -38.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.74% | -13.35% | -16.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.24% | -24.50% | -43.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.43% | -24.50% | -45.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.34% | -41.60% | -37.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.95% | -1.67% | -10.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.26% | -11.00% | -35.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.56% | 6.51% | +4.05% |
Volatility
UCTT vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT) has a higher volatility of 28.54% compared to W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) at 6.13%. This indicates that UCTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCTT | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.54% | 6.13% | +22.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.32% | 18.15% | +41.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.90% | 25.09% | +47.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.42% | 24.74% | +34.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.33% | 28.55% | +30.78% |
Dividends
UCTT vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison
UCTT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 0.69% | 0.88% | 0.76% | 0.88% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 2.27% |
UCTT Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
UCTT vs. GWW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UCTT vs. GWW - Profitability Comparison
UCTT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 84.40M and revenue of 533.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.8%.
GWW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.
UCTT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.40M and revenue of 533.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
GWW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.
UCTT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -17.90M and revenue of 533.70M, resulting in a net margin of -3.4%.
GWW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UCTT and GWW have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCTT has higher volatility (28.54%) compared to GWW (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCTT dropped -95.20% vs GWW's -56.73%.
UCTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.36 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCTT and GWW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer