PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCON vs. AMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UCON vs. AMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) and RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UCON vs. AMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UCON
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
-0.52%7.00%4.69%7.72%-5.72%0.27%
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
0.18%11.38%9.62%6.70%-12.56%-0.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCON achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than AMAX's 0.18% return.


UCON

1D
0.53%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
-0.52%
6M
0.71%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
2.65%
10Y*

AMAX

1D
1.59%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
0.18%
6M
-1.00%
1Y
14.81%
3Y*
8.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UCON vs. AMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCON has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UCON vs. AMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCON
UCON Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
UCON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCON Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCON Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UCON Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCON Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAX
AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCON vs. AMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) and RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCONAMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

1.32

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

1.81

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.98

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.54

6.32

+2.21

UCON vs. AMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCON Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the AMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCON and AMAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCONAMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.32

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.29

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between UCON and AMAX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UCON vs. AMAX - Dividend Comparison

UCON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than AMAX's 10.57% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
UCON
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
4.66%4.63%4.95%4.75%3.12%2.20%3.14%3.25%1.76%
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
10.57%9.18%7.36%6.99%11.22%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UCON vs. AMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCON drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum AMAX drawdown of -16.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCON and AMAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UCONAMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-16.28%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.45%

-7.53%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-6.06%

+4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-5.44%

+3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

2.36%

-1.81%

Volatility

UCON vs. AMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) is 1.54%, while RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that UCON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UCONAMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

4.15%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.06%

8.14%

-6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92%

11.29%

-8.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.84%

10.38%

-6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.94%

10.38%

-4.44%