UCO vs. DZZ
UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) and DZZ (DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes) are both exchange-traded funds - UCO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (200%), while DZZ is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UCO returned 26.28%/yr vs -9.09%/yr for DZZ. Their -0.13 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. UCO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DZZ.
Performance
UCO vs. DZZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCO achieves a 109.21% return, which is significantly higher than DZZ's -50.53% return. Over the past 10 years, UCO has outperformed DZZ with an annualized return of 26.28%, while DZZ has yielded a comparatively lower -9.09% annualized return.
UCO
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 24.87%
- 6M
- 67.72%
- YTD
- 109.21%
- 1Y
- 66.00%
- 3Y*
- 9.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.14%
- 10Y*
- 26.28%
- ALL TIME*
- -9.20%
DZZ
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -7.58%
- 6M
- -52.15%
- YTD
- -50.53%
- 1Y
- 6.12%
- 3Y*
- -9.06%
- 5Y*
- -6.95%
- 10Y*
- -9.09%
- ALL TIME*
- -13.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.88K | $5.95K | $21.77K | |
| $134.26M | $138.13M | $153.19M |
UCO vs. DZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 109.21% | -29.75% | 5.36% | -13.89% | 39.71% | 139.26% | 77.27% | 53.83% | -43.26% | 0.34% |
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | -50.53% | 132.78% | -35.06% | -8.14% | 2.79% | 0.56% | -37.13% | -26.64% | 8.21% | -21.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCO and DZZ is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008 | -0.13 |
The correlation between UCO and DZZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCO vs. DZZ — Risk / Return Rank
UCO
DZZ
UCO vs. DZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCO | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 0.02 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.75 | 0.03 | +3.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCO vs. DZZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCO drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, roughly equal to the maximum DZZ drawdown of -96.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCO and DZZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCO | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.86% | -96.64% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.55% | -81.05% | +42.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.38% | -81.05% | +30.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.24% | -81.05% | +13.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.50% | -81.05% | -15.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.77% | -95.37% | +11.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.13% | -82.40% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.30% | 61.82% | -44.52% |
Volatility
UCO vs. DZZ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a higher volatility of 22.33% compared to DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) at 14.44%. This indicates that UCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCO | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.33% | 14.44% | +7.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.79% | 52.18% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.01% | 170.05% | -110.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.46% | 84.19% | -23.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 317.65% | 64.26% | +253.39% |
UCO vs. DZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DZZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UCO vs. DZZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither UCO nor DZZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UCO and DZZ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCO has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to DZZ (14.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCO dropped -99.86% vs DZZ's -96.64%.
On 10-year performance, UCO leads with 26.28% vs -9.09% for DZZ. On fees, DZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DZZ has been the lower-risk option at 14.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UCO has performed better with a 26.28% return vs -9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.
UCO and DZZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
UCO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while DZZ is Leveraged Commodities. UCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (200%), while DZZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UCO and 0.75% for DZZ.
UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCO and DZZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer