UCO vs. BITO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UCO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (200%), while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. UCO is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UCO returned 13.74%/yr vs 19.35%/yr for BITO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

UCO vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCO achieves a 100.52% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -30.09% return.

UCO

• 1D: 11.74%
• 1M: -7.72%
• 6M: 88.88%
• YTD: 100.52%
• 1Y: 57.67%
• 3Y*: 13.74%
• 5Y*: 14.86%
• 10Y*: 21.66%

BITO

• 1D: -2.65%
• 1M: -2.30%
• 6M: -33.01%
• YTD: -30.09%
• 1Y: -49.36%
• 3Y*: 19.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCO vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	100.52%	-29.75%	5.36%	-13.89%	39.71%	-11.07%
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-30.09%	-11.19%	104.45%	137.33%	-63.91%	-29.31%

Correlation

The correlation between UCO and BITO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021	0.06

Return for Risk

UCO vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 34
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 35
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 29

BITO

BITO Risk / Return Rank: 1
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCO vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UCO	BITO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	-1.12	+2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	-1.77	+3.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.81	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	-0.91	+2.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.22	-1.48	+4.69

UCO vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCO Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCO and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UCO vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCO drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCO and BITO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UCO	BITO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.86%	-77.86%	-22.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.55%	-54.47%	+15.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.38%	-54.47%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.44%	-51.78%	-32.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.12%	-37.03%	-45.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.99%	33.47%	-15.48%

Volatility

UCO vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a higher volatility of 21.64% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 11.12%. This indicates that UCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UCO	BITO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.64%	11.12%	+10.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.97%	34.48%	+15.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.34%	44.12%	+14.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.48%	54.84%	+5.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	317.76%	54.84%	+262.92%

UCO vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UCO and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

UCO vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	62.24%	78.29%	61.59%	15.14%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UCO and BITO in my portfolio?

UCO and BITO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UCO or BITO?

UCO has higher volatility (21.64%) compared to BITO (11.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCO dropped -99.86% vs BITO's -77.86%.

Which ETF is better, UCO or BITO?

On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 19.35% vs 13.74% for UCO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 11.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UCO or BITO?

Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 19.35% return vs 13.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UCO or BITO?

UCO and BITO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UCO or BITO?

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 62.24%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

What is the main difference between UCO and BITO?

UCO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while BITO is Cryptocurrency.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.