UCMCX vs. USNQX
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Cornerstone Moderately Conservative Fund (UCMCX) and USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX).
UCMCX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Jun 7, 2012. USNQX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Oct 27, 2000.
Performance
UCMCX vs. USNQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UCMCX vs. USNQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCMCX USAA Cornerstone Moderately Conservative Fund | 0.50% | 13.75% | 4.15% | 9.23% | -13.17% | 7.21% | 8.25% | 13.10% | -5.30% | 11.46% |
USNQX USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund | -5.93% | 20.52% | 25.42% | 54.46% | -32.71% | 26.82% | 48.31% | 38.86% | -0.43% | 32.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCMCX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than USNQX's -5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, UCMCX has underperformed USNQX with an annualized return of 4.96%, while USNQX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.56% annualized return.
UCMCX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
USNQX
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -4.23%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 18.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UCMCX vs. USNQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCMCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than USNQX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UCMCX vs. USNQX — Risk / Return Rank
UCMCX
USNQX
UCMCX vs. USNQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Cornerstone Moderately Conservative Fund (UCMCX) and USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCMCX | USNQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 1.04 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 1.62 | +0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.23 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.84 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | 6.82 | +2.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCMCX | USNQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.04 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.55 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.82 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.33 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between UCMCX and USNQX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UCMCX vs. USNQX - Dividend Comparison
UCMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than USNQX's 3.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCMCX USAA Cornerstone Moderately Conservative Fund | 3.32% | 3.16% | 2.03% | 2.42% | 7.62% | 6.62% | 1.68% | 2.31% | 4.13% | 4.37% | 2.39% | 3.31% |
USNQX USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund | 3.21% | 3.01% | 2.19% | 2.60% | 4.13% | 4.48% | 1.53% | 0.88% | 0.69% | 1.97% | 0.50% | 2.73% |
Drawdowns
UCMCX vs. USNQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCMCX drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, smaller than the maximum USNQX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCMCX and USNQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCMCX | USNQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -76.24% | +54.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.72% | -12.72% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | -36.95% | +15.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.85% | -36.95% | +15.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -9.06% | +5.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -26.93% | +23.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 3.44% | -2.10% |
Volatility
UCMCX vs. USNQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for USAA Cornerstone Moderately Conservative Fund (UCMCX) is 3.36%, while USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that UCMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USNQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UCMCX | USNQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 6.56% | -3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.10% | 12.90% | -7.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.00% | 22.75% | -14.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.51% | 22.92% | -14.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.82% | 22.61% | -14.79% |