UCIB vs. MLPR
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR).
UCIB and MLPR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UCIB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Index. It was launched on Oct 8, 2015. MLPR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. Both UCIB and MLPR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UCIB vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UCIB vs. MLPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 17.46% | 8.97% | 6.58% | -2.26% | 18.24% | 37.34% | 27.99% |
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 24.29% | 9.83% | 31.57% | 35.87% | 41.04% | 57.33% | -9.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCIB achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly lower than MLPR's 24.29% return.
UCIB
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 8.87%
- YTD
- 17.46%
- 6M
- 21.31%
- 1Y
- 24.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
MLPR
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 24.29%
- 6M
- 30.59%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- 32.28%
- 5Y*
- 32.14%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UCIB vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCIB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UCIB vs. MLPR — Risk / Return Rank
UCIB
MLPR
UCIB vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCIB | MLPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 0.57 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 0.86 | +0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.13 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 0.62 | +1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 1.44 | +4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCIB | MLPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.57 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.09 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.93 | -0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between UCIB and MLPR is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UCIB vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison
UCIB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 9.14% | 10.85% | 9.57% | 10.08% | 7.49% | 10.69% | 4.21% |
Drawdowns
UCIB vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCIB drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, smaller than the maximum MLPR drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCIB and MLPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCIB | MLPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.94% | -48.98% | +12.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -24.45% | +13.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.95% | -28.66% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -4.17% | +3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.12% | -9.09% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 10.53% | -6.62% |
Volatility
UCIB vs. MLPR - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) have volatilities of 5.12% and 4.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UCIB | MLPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 4.93% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 14.06% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 28.04% | -5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 29.60% | -5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 34.01% | -12.39% |