PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCC vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UCC vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCC achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 8.26% return.


UCC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.72%
6M
-8.61%
YTD
-7.03%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
-0.73%
10Y*
13.51%
ALL TIME*
13.30%

XTJL

1D
1.05%
1M
2.80%
6M
7.47%
YTD
8.26%
1Y
15.04%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$370.01K$220.92K$193.13K
$25.35K$29.67K$228.37K

UCC vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services
-7.03%2.21%44.24%61.67%-57.59%3.44%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
8.26%15.42%14.43%25.72%-15.66%7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between UCC and XTJL is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.80

The correlation between UCC and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCC vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UCC
UCC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
UCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCC Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UCC vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UCCXTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.42

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

2.95

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

16.27

-15.64

UCC vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCC and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UCC vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCC drawdown since its inception was -83.05%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCC and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCCXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.05%

-23.24%

-59.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.14%

-5.12%

-24.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.01%

-16.70%

-31.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.77%

-23.24%

-38.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.99%

0.00%

-16.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.79%

-3.92%

-17.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.36%

0.93%

+11.43%

Volatility

UCC vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) has a higher volatility of 14.94% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 3.09%. This indicates that UCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCCXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.94%

3.09%

+11.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.50%

6.23%

+24.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.87%

7.79%

+31.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.27%

15.12%

+29.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.97%

15.03%

+25.94%

UCC vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

UCC vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

UCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services
1.24%1.10%0.17%0.04%0.25%0.00%0.02%0.17%0.18%0.14%0.21%0.14%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UCC and XTJL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UCC has higher volatility (14.94%) compared to XTJL (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCC dropped -83.05% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

On 5-year performance, XTJL leads with 9.86% vs -0.73% for UCC. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 9.86% return vs -0.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCC.

UCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UCC and 0.79% for XTJL.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCC and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer