UCC vs. AMDG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UCC (ProShares Ultra Consumer Services) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UCC is passively managed, while AMDG is actively managed. Over the past year, UCC returned 10.16% vs 1059.96% for AMDG. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMDG.

Performance

UCC vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCC achieves a -7.17% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 357.64% return.

UCC

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -2.31%
• YTD: -7.17%
• 6M: -6.64%
• 1Y: 10.16%
• 3Y*: 18.80%
• 5Y*: 0.60%
• 10Y*: 14.07%

AMDG

• 1D: -6.80%
• 1M: 102.23%
• YTD: 357.64%
• 6M: 342.85%
• 1Y: 1,059.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCC vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services	-7.17%	-2.21%
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	357.64%	96.98%

Correlation

The correlation between UCC and AMDG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2025	0.44

The correlation between UCC and AMDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UCC vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCC

UCC Risk / Return Rank: 14
UCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
UCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
UCC Omega Ratio Rank: 14
UCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
UCC Martin Ratio Rank: 14

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCC vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UCC	AMDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.28	8.25	-7.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	4.60	-3.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.61	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	18.97	-18.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.01	37.13	-36.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UCC vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 8.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCC and AMDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UCC	AMDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28	8.25	-7.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	3.14	-2.81

Drawdowns

UCC vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCC drawdown since its inception was -83.05%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCC and AMDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	UCC	AMDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.05%	-63.04%	-20.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.14%	-56.48%	+27.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.12%	-6.80%	-10.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.80%	-25.64%	+3.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.14%	28.80%	-18.66%

Volatility

UCC vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) is 10.36%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 46.46%. This indicates that UCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UCC	AMDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.36%	46.46%	-36.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.43%	95.14%	-68.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.20%	129.86%	-93.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.60%	130.24%	-86.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.61%	130.24%	-89.63%

UCC vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

UCC vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

UCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than AMDG's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	2.45%	11.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services	1.17%	1.10%	0.17%	0.04%	0.25%	0.00%	0.02%	0.17%	0.18%	0.14%	0.21%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UCC and AMDG in my portfolio?

UCC and AMDG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UCC or AMDG?

AMDG has higher volatility (46.46%) compared to UCC (10.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCC dropped -83.05% vs AMDG's -63.04%.

Which ETF is better, UCC or AMDG?

On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 1059.96% vs 10.16% for UCC. On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UCC has been the lower-risk option at 10.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UCC or AMDG?

Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 1059.96% return vs 10.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UCC or AMDG?

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UCC or AMDG?

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 1.17% for UCC.

What is the main difference between UCC and AMDG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UCC and 0.75% for AMDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.25 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.