PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCAGX vs. FSRKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UCAGX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund (UCAGX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCAGX achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than FSRKX's 8.80% return.


UCAGX

1D
0.54%
1M
4.48%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.69%
1Y
25.54%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
9.34%

FSRKX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.80%
6M
9.07%
1Y
16.83%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCAGX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UCAGX
USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund
10.91%19.22%10.43%14.37%-13.55%16.23%9.48%6.03%
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
8.80%10.59%6.00%4.81%-3.13%16.06%3.94%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between UCAGX and FSRKX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2019

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between UCAGX and FSRKX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCAGX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCAGX
UCAGX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
UCAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UCAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRKX
FSRKX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCAGX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund (UCAGX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCAGXFSRKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.73

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

8.79

-5.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.18

32.89

-18.71

UCAGX vs. FSRKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCAGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is lower than the FSRKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCAGX and FSRKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCAGXFSRKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

3.61

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.95

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.93

-0.29

Drawdowns

UCAGX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCAGX drawdown since its inception was -29.07%, which is greater than FSRKX's maximum drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCAGX and FSRKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCAGXFSRKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.07%

-19.93%

-9.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

-1.93%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.61%

-5.84%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-12.74%

-12.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.72%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-3.21%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

0.51%

+1.31%

Volatility

UCAGX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund (UCAGX) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) at 1.33%. This indicates that UCAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCAGXFSRKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

1.33%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.60%

3.67%

+4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

4.71%

+6.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

6.94%

+7.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.18%

7.79%

+6.39%

UCAGX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCAGX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

UCAGX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison

UCAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.96%, more than FSRKX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
4.25%4.83%4.98%5.38%7.38%5.43%2.31%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UCAGX
USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund
9.96%11.04%8.14%1.96%4.79%8.52%1.89%2.03%5.99%6.74%1.48%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


UCAGX and FSRKX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UCAGX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to FSRKX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCAGX dropped -29.07% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.

FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCAGX and FSRKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer