UC98.L vs. WRDA.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

UC98.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and WRDA.L (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UC98.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while WRDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UC98.L returned 8.23% vs 26.06% for WRDA.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UC98.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for WRDA.L.

Performance

UC98.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC98.L achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than WRDA.L's 9.82% return.

UC98.L

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 6M: 3.49%
• 1Y: 8.23%
• 3Y*: 3.76%
• 5Y*: 1.03%
• 10Y*: 2.30%

WRDA.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 9.82%
• 6M: 9.92%
• 1Y: 26.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC98.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UC98.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	2.66%	0.33%	3.54%
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc	9.82%	12.77%	20.02%

Correlation

The correlation between UC98.L and WRDA.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	0.24

Return for Risk

UC98.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC98.L

UC98.L Risk / Return Rank: 41
UC98.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
UC98.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
UC98.L Omega Ratio Rank: 43
UC98.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
UC98.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

WRDA.L

WRDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
WRDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
WRDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
WRDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
WRDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC98.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UC98.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	0.60	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.27	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.43	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	0.95	+0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	1.42	+2.63

UC98.L vs. WRDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC98.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC98.L and WRDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UC98.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC98.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC98.L and WRDA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC98.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.07%	-27.39%	-8.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.86%	-27.39%	+22.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.60%	-16.67%	+9.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.43%	-7.98%	-6.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	18.33%	-16.30%

Volatility

UC98.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) is 1.65%, while UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that UC98.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC98.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.65%	3.18%	-1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.48%	7.69%	-3.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.03%	43.19%	-37.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.95%	29.78%	-20.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.91%	29.78%	-19.87%

UC98.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC98.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UC98.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison

UC98.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while WRDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UC98.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	4.36%	5.96%	4.81%	3.91%	2.35%	2.01%	2.72%	3.27%	2.04%	1.74%
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC98.L and WRDA.L in my portfolio?

UC98.L and WRDA.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC98.L or WRDA.L?

On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC98.L or WRDA.L?

WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UC98.L.

What is the main difference between UC98.L and WRDA.L?

UC98.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while WRDA.L is Global Equities. UC98.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UC98.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.