PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC98.L vs. UC04.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC98.L vs. UC04.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC98.L achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than UC04.L's 10.54% return. Over the past 10 years, UC98.L has underperformed UC04.L with an annualized return of 2.30%, while UC04.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.


UC98.L

1D
0.62%
1M
3.34%
YTD
2.66%
6M
3.49%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
2.30%

UC04.L

1D
0.93%
1M
1.32%
YTD
10.54%
6M
10.67%
1Y
27.27%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC98.L vs. UC04.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC98.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.66%0.33%3.62%2.43%-7.46%-1.33%6.37%12.84%2.31%-4.16%
UC04.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
10.54%9.28%27.38%20.50%-10.51%28.96%16.61%26.56%-0.32%10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between UC98.L and UC04.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2015

0.30

The correlation between UC98.L and UC04.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (5 years) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC98.L vs. UC04.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC98.L
UC98.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
UC98.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC98.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC98.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
UC98.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC98.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

UC04.L
UC04.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
UC04.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC04.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC04.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UC04.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC04.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC98.L vs. UC04.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UC98.LUC04.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

0.94

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

1.42

+2.63

UC98.L vs. UC04.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC98.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the UC04.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC98.L and UC04.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UC98.L vs. UC04.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC98.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum UC04.L drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC98.L and UC04.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC98.LUC04.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-39.47%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-28.93%

+24.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.30%

-28.93%

+20.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.17%

-28.93%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.62%

-28.93%

+9.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.60%

-16.65%

+9.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.43%

-7.96%

-6.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

19.15%

-17.12%

Volatility

UC98.L vs. UC04.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) is 1.65%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that UC98.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC04.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC98.LUC04.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

3.64%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.48%

7.78%

-3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.03%

43.50%

-37.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.95%

23.92%

-14.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.91%

20.59%

-10.68%

UC98.L vs. UC04.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC98.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than UC04.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC98.L vs. UC04.L - Dividend Comparison

UC98.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than UC04.L's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UC04.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.85%0.96%0.95%1.11%1.19%0.89%1.28%1.40%1.50%1.32%1.52%1.44%
UC98.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
4.36%5.96%4.81%3.91%2.35%2.01%2.72%3.27%2.04%1.74%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC98.L and UC04.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC04.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC04.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UC98.L.

UC98.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while UC04.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. UC98.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while UC04.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UC98.L and 0.14% for UC04.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC98.L and UC04.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer