UC96.L vs. R1VL.L
UC96.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and R1VL.L (iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - UC96.L tracks the Russell 1000 Value TR USD while R1VL.L tracks the Russell 1000 Value UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UC96.L returned 10.32%/yr vs 16.27%/yr for R1VL.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UC96.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for R1VL.L.
Performance
UC96.L vs. R1VL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UC96.L is traded in GBp, while R1VL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the R1VL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC96.L achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than R1VL.L's 18.39% return.
UC96.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
R1VL.L
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- YTD
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 28.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UC96.L vs. R1VL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 7.45% | 4.85% | 9.71% | 8.53% |
R1VL.L iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 18.39% | 7.74% | 15.44% | 6.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC96.L and R1VL.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between UC96.L and R1VL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC96.L vs. R1VL.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC96.L
R1VL.L
UC96.L vs. R1VL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (R1VL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UC96.L | R1VL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.48 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 5.83 | -3.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.81 | 20.12 | -12.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UC96.L vs. R1VL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC96.L drawdown since its inception was -26.78%, which is greater than R1VL.L's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC96.L and R1VL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC96.L | R1VL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.78% | -17.69% | -9.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.87% | -4.94% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -17.69% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -0.31% | -2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -2.97% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.43% | +0.71% |
Volatility
UC96.L vs. R1VL.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (R1VL.L) at 3.08%. This indicates that UC96.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than R1VL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC96.L | R1VL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 3.08% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 8.44% | -0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.69% | 10.89% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 12.74% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 12.74% | +2.97% |
UC96.L vs. R1VL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC96.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than R1VL.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UC96.L vs. R1VL.L - Dividend Comparison
UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while R1VL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1VL.L iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.15% | 1.21% | 0.69% | 1.53% | 1.53% | 1.62% | 1.84% | 1.39% | 1.86% | 1.58% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC96.L and R1VL.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, R1VL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
R1VL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC96.L.
UC96.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while R1VL.L tracks Russell 1000 Value UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC96.L and 0.18% for R1VL.L.
Find the right allocation for UC96.L and R1VL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer