R1VL.L vs. IGLN.L
R1VL.L (iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF) and IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - R1VL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF, while IGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, R1VL.L returned 17.59%/yr vs 27.22%/yr for IGLN.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
R1VL.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R1VL.L achieves a 17.42% return, which is significantly higher than IGLN.L's -6.13% return.
R1VL.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 14.08%
- YTD
- 17.42%
- 1Y
- 28.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGLN.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -12.44%
- YTD
- -6.13%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- 27.22%
- 5Y*
- 17.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
R1VL.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1VL.L iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF | 17.42% | 16.01% | 13.45% | 6.43% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -6.13% | 64.93% | 26.14% | 8.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between R1VL.L and IGLN.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.23 |
The correlation between R1VL.L and IGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
R1VL.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
R1VL.L
IGLN.L
R1VL.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF (R1VL.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| R1VL.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.16 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.07 | 0.88 | +4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.94 | 2.15 | +16.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
R1VL.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R1VL.L drawdown since its inception was -16.43%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -45.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R1VL.L and IGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| R1VL.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.43% | -45.25% | +28.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | -24.39% | +18.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.43% | -24.39% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -23.66% | +23.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -19.73% | +17.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 9.97% | -8.42% |
Volatility
R1VL.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF (R1VL.L) is 2.53%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that R1VL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| R1VL.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 7.59% | -5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 23.02% | -15.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.50% | 26.39% | -15.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.60% | 17.79% | -5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.60% | 15.74% | -3.14% |
Dividends
R1VL.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither R1VL.L nor IGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
R1VL.L and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
R1VL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IGLN.L is Gold. R1VL.L tracks iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price.
Find the right allocation for R1VL.L and IGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer