UC96.L vs. VWRP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L).
UC96.L and VWRP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UC96.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value TR USD. It was launched on Aug 26, 2015. VWRP.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Jul 23, 2019. Both UC96.L and VWRP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UC96.L or VWRP.L.
Key characteristics
| UC96.L | VWRP.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.36% | 18.64% |
| 1Y Return | 22.13% | 25.11% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.43% | 7.74% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.14% | 11.46% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.05 | 2.52 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.06 | 3.51 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.48 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.53 | 4.05 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.43 | 17.83 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.91% | 1.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.60% | 9.73% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.78% | -25.10% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC96.L and VWRP.L is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
UC96.L vs. VWRP.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, UC96.L achieves a 14.36% return, which is significantly lower than VWRP.L's 18.64% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UC96.L vs. VWRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC96.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRP.L's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UC96.L vs. VWRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UC96.L vs. VWRP.L - Dividend Comparison
UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while VWRP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.66% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.84% | 1.39% | 1.86% | 1.58% | 1.34% |
VWRP.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UC96.L vs. VWRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC96.L drawdown since its inception was -26.78%, which is greater than VWRP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC96.L and VWRP.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UC96.L vs. VWRP.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) at 2.85%. This indicates that UC96.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.