PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
R1VL.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

R1VL.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF (R1VL.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

R1VL.L is traded in USD, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with R1VL.L having a 17.42% return and IITU.L slightly higher at 17.45%.


R1VL.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.32%
6M
14.08%
YTD
17.42%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
10Y*

IITU.L

1D
-0.41%
1M
-2.54%
6M
20.12%
YTD
17.45%
1Y
32.12%
3Y*
29.51%
5Y*
21.16%
10Y*
25.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

R1VL.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
R1VL.L
iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF
17.42%16.01%13.45%6.43%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
17.45%23.07%38.50%12.62%

Correlation

The correlation between R1VL.L and IITU.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

R1VL.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

R1VL.L
R1VL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
R1VL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
R1VL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
R1VL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
R1VL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
R1VL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

R1VL.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF (R1VL.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


R1VL.LIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.25

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.07

1.90

+3.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.94

5.17

+13.77

R1VL.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current R1VL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of R1VL.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

R1VL.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum R1VL.L drawdown since its inception was -16.43%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -43.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R1VL.L and IITU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


R1VL.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.43%

-43.85%

+27.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

-16.80%

+11.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.43%

-26.42%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-7.53%

+7.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.35%

-10.59%

+8.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

6.20%

-4.65%

Volatility

R1VL.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF (R1VL.L) is 2.53%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that R1VL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


R1VL.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

7.45%

-4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

17.21%

-9.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

21.89%

-11.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.60%

27.39%

-14.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.60%

24.22%

-11.62%

Dividends

R1VL.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither R1VL.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


R1VL.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

R1VL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. R1VL.L tracks iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for R1VL.L and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer