UC90.L vs. UC15.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UC90.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc) and UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds from UBS - UC90.L tracks the UBS CMCI (GBP Hedged) while UC15.L tracks the UBS CMCI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC90.L returned 7.57%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for UC15.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.34% expense ratio.

Performance

UC90.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UC90.L having a 21.40% return and UC15.L slightly higher at 21.49%. Over the past 10 years, UC90.L has underperformed UC15.L with an annualized return of 7.57%, while UC15.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.68% annualized return.

UC90.L

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: 21.40%
• 6M: 22.49%
• 1Y: 30.42%
• 3Y*: 12.90%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

UC15.L

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 21.49%
• 6M: 22.05%
• 1Y: 32.45%
• 3Y*: 10.32%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC90.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UC90.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc	21.40%	9.58%	4.52%	-2.02%	14.86%	33.21%	-1.26%	5.91%	-11.85%	5.39%
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	21.49%	2.57%	6.44%	-6.52%	29.97%	36.11%	-2.49%	5.31%	-5.25%	-2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between UC90.L and UC15.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2015	0.74

The correlation between UC90.L and UC15.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

UC90.L vs. UC15.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UC90.L	UC15.L
Technology	31.0%	31.0%
Communication Services	15.0%	15.0%
Energy	14.2%	14.2%
Financial Services	10.9%	10.9%
Healthcare	9.8%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	7.3%
Industrials	6.6%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	3.7%
Utilities	1.1%	1.1%
Basic Materials	0.5%	0.5%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

UC90.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC90.L

UC90.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
UC90.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UC90.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
UC90.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
UC90.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
UC90.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

UC15.L

UC15.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
UC15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
UC15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
UC15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UC15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UC15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC90.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UC90.L	UC15.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	2.12	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	2.77	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.39	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.33	5.23	+1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.07	13.93	+0.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC90.L vs. UC15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC90.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the UC15.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC90.L and UC15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UC90.L	UC15.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	2.12	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.87	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.66	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.33	+0.05

Drawdowns

UC90.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC90.L drawdown since its inception was -41.45%, roughly equal to the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -42.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC90.L and UC15.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC90.L	UC15.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.45%	-42.93%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.79%	-6.18%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.47%	-13.98%	+2.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.19%	-17.43%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.26%	-30.26%	-8.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.67%	-3.53%	-1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.18%	-15.17%	+1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	2.32%	-0.16%

Volatility

UC90.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) have volatilities of 4.94% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC90.L	UC15.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	5.07%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.29%	12.34%	-2.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.48%	15.26%	-2.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	14.69%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.23%	14.80%	-0.57%

UC90.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UC90.L and UC15.L have an expense ratio of 0.34%.

Dividends

UC90.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UC90.L nor UC15.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC90.L and UC15.L in my portfolio?

UC90.L and UC15.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC90.L or UC15.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.34% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC90.L or UC15.L?

UC90.L and UC15.L have the same expense ratio: 0.34% per year.

What is the main difference between UC90.L and UC15.L?

UC90.L tracks UBS CMCI (GBP Hedged), while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI.