PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC90.L vs. XFRM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UC90.L vs. XFRM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L) and WisdomTree Broad Commodities Ex-Agriculture and Livestock (XFRM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UC90.L vs. XFRM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC90.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc
15.49%9.58%4.52%-2.02%14.86%33.21%-1.26%5.91%-11.85%5.39%
XFRM.L
WisdomTree Broad Commodities Ex-Agriculture and Livestock
35.23%14.37%8.56%-13.95%28.86%28.08%-11.79%5.91%-7.24%-2.60%
Different Trading Currencies

UC90.L is traded in GBp, while XFRM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XFRM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC90.L achieves a 15.49% return, which is significantly lower than XFRM.L's 35.23% return. Over the past 10 years, UC90.L has underperformed XFRM.L with an annualized return of 8.33%, while XFRM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.62% annualized return.


UC90.L

1D
-1.24%
1M
6.64%
YTD
15.49%
6M
19.73%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
9.65%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
8.33%

XFRM.L

1D
-1.70%
1M
12.69%
YTD
35.23%
6M
46.56%
1Y
43.36%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
17.88%
10Y*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UC90.L vs. XFRM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC90.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than XFRM.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UC90.L vs. XFRM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC90.L
UC90.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UC90.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC90.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC90.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
UC90.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC90.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

XFRM.L
XFRM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XFRM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFRM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFRM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XFRM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFRM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC90.L vs. XFRM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L) and WisdomTree Broad Commodities Ex-Agriculture and Livestock (XFRM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC90.LXFRM.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

1.96

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

2.50

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

4.75

-2.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.97

10.72

-1.75

UC90.L vs. XFRM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC90.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the XFRM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC90.L and XFRM.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC90.LXFRM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.96

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.89

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.57

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.24

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between UC90.L and XFRM.L is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UC90.L vs. XFRM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UC90.L nor XFRM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UC90.L vs. XFRM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC90.L drawdown since its inception was -41.45%, smaller than the maximum XFRM.L drawdown of -45.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC90.L and XFRM.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UC90.LXFRM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.45%

-56.89%

+15.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-11.89%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.19%

-33.87%

+14.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.26%

-37.47%

-0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-1.48%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

-31.17%

+17.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

3.89%

-1.67%

Volatility

UC90.L vs. XFRM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L) is 4.88%, while WisdomTree Broad Commodities Ex-Agriculture and Livestock (XFRM.L) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that UC90.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XFRM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UC90.LXFRM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

10.30%

-5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

18.41%

-8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

22.07%

-8.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

20.07%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.26%

18.55%

-4.29%