PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC84.L vs. XZBU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC84.L vs. XZBU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC84.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UC84.L is traded in GBp, while XZBU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XZBU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


UC84.L

1D
0.23%
1M
1.54%
YTD
0.32%
6M
-0.15%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
2.40%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
3.15%

XZBU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC84.L vs. XZBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UC84.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.32%0.41%3.96%2.43%-7.77%-0.84%-2.71%
XZBU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
34.27%0.67%2.68%2.98%-8.73%-0.87%-2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between UC84.L and XZBU.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.97

The correlation between UC84.L and XZBU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC84.L vs. XZBU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC84.L
UC84.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
UC84.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC84.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC84.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
UC84.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC84.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XZBU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC84.L vs. XZBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC84.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC84.LXZBU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.20

UC84.L vs. XZBU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC84.LXZBU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

Drawdowns

UC84.L vs. XZBU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC84.LXZBU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

Volatility

UC84.L vs. XZBU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC84.LXZBU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.40%

UC84.L vs. XZBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC84.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XZBU.L's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC84.L vs. XZBU.L - Dividend Comparison

UC84.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, while XZBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UC84.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
5.52%4.82%4.55%4.27%2.69%2.28%3.02%3.48%3.37%2.98%3.21%1.40%
XZBU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, UC84.L and XZBU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XZBU.L is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZBU.L is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UC84.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UC84.L and 0.16% for XZBU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC84.L and XZBU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer