PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZBU.L vs. IGSD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZBU.L vs. IGSD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L) and iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IGSD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XZBU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IGSD.L

1D
0.21%
1M
1.49%
YTD
1.02%
6M
0.78%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
3.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZBU.L vs. IGSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XZBU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
34.27%0.67%2.68%2.98%-8.73%-0.87%-2.84%
IGSD.L
iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.02%-0.44%7.51%0.40%7.27%0.80%-4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XZBU.L and IGSD.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.70

The correlation between XZBU.L and IGSD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZBU.L vs. IGSD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZBU.L

IGSD.L
IGSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IGSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IGSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZBU.L vs. IGSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L) and iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IGSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XZBU.L vs. IGSD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZBU.LIGSD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

Drawdowns

XZBU.L vs. IGSD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZBU.LIGSD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

Volatility

XZBU.L vs. IGSD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZBU.LIGSD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.13%

XZBU.L vs. IGSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZBU.L has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IGSD.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZBU.L vs. IGSD.L - Dividend Comparison

XZBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGSD.L
iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.06%5.08%4.67%3.69%2.12%1.71%2.51%3.32%2.94%2.50%2.16%2.11%
XZBU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XZBU.L and IGSD.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZBU.L is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZBU.L is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IGSD.L.

XZBU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while IGSD.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XZBU.L and 0.20% for IGSD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZBU.L and IGSD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer