PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZBU.L vs. VCLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZBU.L vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XZBU.L is traded in GBP, while VCLT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VCLT values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XZBU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VCLT

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.31%
YTD
1.36%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
1.76%
5Y*
-0.73%
10Y*
3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZBU.L vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XZBU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
34.27%0.67%2.68%2.98%-8.73%-0.87%-2.84%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
1.36%-0.45%-0.18%5.62%-16.65%-0.80%-2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XZBU.L and VCLT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.72

The correlation between XZBU.L and VCLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZBU.L vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZBU.L

VCLT
VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZBU.L vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XZBU.L vs. VCLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZBU.LVCLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

Drawdowns

XZBU.L vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZBU.LVCLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

Volatility

XZBU.L vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZBU.LVCLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.41%

XZBU.L vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZBU.L has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZBU.L vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison

XZBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VCLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.55%5.51%5.19%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%
XZBU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XZBU.L and VCLT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VCLT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XZBU.L.

XZBU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while VCLT tracks Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XZBU.L and 0.04% for VCLT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZBU.L and VCLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer