UC84.L vs. CBS5.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC84.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L).

UC84.L and CBS5.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UC84.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. It was launched on May 30, 2014. CBS5.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. It was launched on Mar 31, 2022. Both UC84.L and CBS5.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

UC84.L vs. CBS5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC84.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UC84.L vs. CBS5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UC84.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.59%	0.41%	3.96%	2.43%	-0.70%
CBS5.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	1.00%	-0.23%	6.03%	0.27%	2.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC84.L achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than CBS5.L's 1.00% return.

UC84.L

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 0.59%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 1.82%
• 3Y*: 2.15%
• 5Y*: 1.06%
• 10Y*: 3.13%

CBS5.L

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 1.00%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: 1.67%
• 3Y*: 2.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC84.L vs. CBS5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC84.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CBS5.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

CBS5.L

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc

UC84.L

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

Return for Risk

UC84.L vs. CBS5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC84.L

UC84.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
UC84.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
UC84.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
UC84.L Omega Ratio Rank: 15
UC84.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
UC84.L Martin Ratio Rank: 17

CBS5.L

CBS5.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
CBS5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
CBS5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
CBS5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CBS5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CBS5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC84.L vs. CBS5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC84.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UC84.L	CBS5.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	0.25	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	0.40	-0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.05	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.39	0.39	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.80	0.76	+0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC84.L vs. CBS5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC84.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is comparable to the CBS5.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC84.L and CBS5.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UC84.L	CBS5.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24	0.25	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.29	+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between UC84.L and CBS5.L is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

UC84.L vs. CBS5.L - Dividend Comparison

UC84.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, while CBS5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UC84.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	5.50%	4.82%	4.55%	4.27%	2.69%	2.28%	3.02%	3.48%	3.37%	2.98%	3.21%	1.40%
CBS5.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UC84.L vs. CBS5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC84.L drawdown since its inception was -18.73%, which is greater than CBS5.L's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC84.L and CBS5.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC84.L	CBS5.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.73%	-14.59%	-4.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.82%	-5.18%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.08%	-2.59%	-5.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.17%	-6.41%	-1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	2.69%	+0.18%

Volatility

UC84.L vs. CBS5.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC84.L) has a higher volatility of 2.06% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) at 1.96%. This indicates that UC84.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBS5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC84.L	CBS5.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.06%	1.96%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.56%	4.20%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.46%	6.68%	+0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.17%	8.03%	+1.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.45%	8.03%	+2.42%