PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UC44.L vs. LGGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UC44.L vs. LGGG.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

UC44.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from UBS and Legal & General respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC44.L returned 10.45%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for LGGG.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UC44.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGGG.L.

Performance

UC44.L vs. LGGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC44.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC44.L achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than LGGG.L's 9.76% return.

UC44.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.45%
YTD
10.92%
6M
10.81%
1Y
22.80%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
13.05%

LGGG.L

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.40%
YTD
9.76%
6M
9.88%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
18.26%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC44.L vs. LGGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UC44.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		10.92%5.87%18.31%22.09%-15.46%26.34%14.89%24.15%-5.43%
LGGG.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF		9.76%12.92%21.13%18.08%-8.24%23.53%12.41%22.99%-27.80%

Correlation

The correlation between UC44.L and LGGG.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.95

The correlation between UC44.L and LGGG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

UC44.L vs. LGGG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UC44.L
LGGG.L

Technology

35.7%
31.5%

Financial Services

17.0%
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
9.4%

Industrials

11.7%
10.5%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.3%
9.2%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.7%

Utilities

0.8%
2.3%

Energy

0.0%
3.6%

Technology

UC44.L
35.7%
LGGG.L
31.5%

Financial Services

UC44.L
17.0%
LGGG.L
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

UC44.L
11.7%
LGGG.L
9.4%

Industrials

UC44.L
11.7%
LGGG.L
10.5%

Healthcare

UC44.L
9.1%
LGGG.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

UC44.L
5.3%
LGGG.L
4.9%

Communication Services

UC44.L
3.3%
LGGG.L
9.2%

Basic Materials

UC44.L
3.1%
LGGG.L
3.2%

Real Estate

UC44.L
2.3%
LGGG.L
1.7%

Utilities

UC44.L
0.8%
LGGG.L
2.3%

Energy

UC44.L
0.0%
LGGG.L
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF

Often compared with UC44.L:
UC44.L vs. SRIW.LUC44.L vs. V3AB.LUC44.L vs. VWRP.LUC44.L vs. ^GSPCUC44.L vs. SEMC.LUC44.L vs. UBTL.LUC44.L vs. EUFM.L
Often compared with LGGG.L:
LGGG.L vs. VWRP.LLGGG.L vs. SWLD.LLGGG.L vs. VEVE.LLGGG.L vs. SWDA.LLGGG.L vs. FUQIXLGGG.L vs. VFEM.LLGGG.L vs. VALW.L

Return for Risk

UC44.L vs. LGGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UC44.L
UC44.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UC44.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC44.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC44.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
UC44.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC44.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
LGGG.L
LGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC44.L vs. LGGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC44.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

UC44.LLGGG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.90
2.47

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.70
3.44

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.47

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

3.88

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.38

15.16

-6.78

UC44.L vs. LGGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC44.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC44.L and LGGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UC44.L vs. LGGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC44.L drawdown since its inception was -52.68%, which is greater than LGGG.L's maximum drawdown of -30.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC44.L and LGGG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UC44.LLGGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.68%

-30.19%

-22.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-6.67%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.15%

-19.95%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

-19.95%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.11%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-1.27%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-7.18%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

1.71%

+1.00%

Volatility

UC44.L vs. LGGG.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC44.L) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) at 3.20%. This indicates that UC44.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UC44.LLGGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

3.20%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

7.79%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

10.47%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.52%

19.12%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

20.36%

-5.45%

UC44.L vs. LGGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC44.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than LGGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UC44.L vs. LGGG.L - Dividend Comparison

UC44.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while LGGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGGG.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC44.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		0.85%1.01%1.05%1.13%1.33%1.01%1.23%1.70%1.88%1.91%1.81%1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

UC44.L and LGGG.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for UC44.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for UC44.L and 0.10% for LGGG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC44.L and LGGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer