UC44.L vs. VWRP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC44.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L).
UC44.L and VWRP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UC44.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Aug 19, 2011. VWRP.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Jul 23, 2019. Both UC44.L and VWRP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UC44.L or VWRP.L.
Correlation
The correlation between UC44.L and VWRP.L is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
UC44.L vs. VWRP.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UC44.L:
1.37
VWRP.L:
2.09
UC44.L:
1.93
VWRP.L:
2.94
UC44.L:
1.26
VWRP.L:
1.39
UC44.L:
2.39
VWRP.L:
3.50
UC44.L:
8.08
VWRP.L:
15.15
UC44.L:
2.01%
VWRP.L:
1.40%
UC44.L:
11.97%
VWRP.L:
10.23%
UC44.L:
-24.11%
VWRP.L:
-25.10%
UC44.L:
-3.02%
VWRP.L:
-0.24%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC44.L achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than VWRP.L's 4.28% return.
UC44.L
1.62%
1.25%
10.94%
14.50%
11.42%
12.20%
VWRP.L
4.28%
3.30%
13.74%
19.68%
11.33%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UC44.L vs. VWRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UC44.L and VWRP.L have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UC44.L vs. VWRP.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UC44.L
VWRP.L
UC44.L vs. VWRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC44.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UC44.L vs. VWRP.L - Dividend Comparison
UC44.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while VWRP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC44.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.04% | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.33% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.91% | 1.81% | 1.78% | 2.00% |
VWRP.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UC44.L vs. VWRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC44.L drawdown since its inception was -24.11%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRP.L drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC44.L and VWRP.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UC44.L vs. VWRP.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC44.L) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) at 2.98%. This indicates that UC44.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.