UC44.L vs. V3AB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC44.L) and Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L).
UC44.L and V3AB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UC44.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Aug 19, 2011. V3AB.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Mar 23, 2021. Both UC44.L and V3AB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UC44.L or V3AB.L.
Correlation
The correlation between UC44.L and V3AB.L is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
UC44.L vs. V3AB.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UC44.L:
1.34
V3AB.L:
1.84
UC44.L:
1.90
V3AB.L:
2.56
UC44.L:
1.26
V3AB.L:
1.34
UC44.L:
2.33
V3AB.L:
3.01
UC44.L:
7.63
V3AB.L:
12.05
UC44.L:
2.07%
V3AB.L:
1.67%
UC44.L:
11.84%
V3AB.L:
10.95%
UC44.L:
-24.11%
V3AB.L:
-17.30%
UC44.L:
-3.15%
V3AB.L:
-0.57%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC44.L achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than V3AB.L's 3.74% return.
UC44.L
1.48%
-2.30%
8.13%
15.75%
11.35%
15.45%
V3AB.L
3.74%
0.38%
11.75%
20.05%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UC44.L vs. V3AB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC44.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than V3AB.L's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UC44.L vs. V3AB.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UC44.L
V3AB.L
UC44.L vs. V3AB.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC44.L) and Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UC44.L vs. V3AB.L - Dividend Comparison
UC44.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while V3AB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC44.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.04% | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.33% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.90% | 1.81% | 1.79% | 2.02% |
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UC44.L vs. V3AB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC44.L drawdown since its inception was -24.11%, which is greater than V3AB.L's maximum drawdown of -17.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC44.L and V3AB.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UC44.L vs. V3AB.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC44.L) and Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) have volatilities of 3.25% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.