UC15.L vs. RICI.L
UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and RICI.L (Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF) are both Commodities funds - UC15.L tracks the UBS CMCI while RICI.L tracks the Rogers International Commodity (RICI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC15.L returned 12.77%/yr vs 13.77%/yr for RICI.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UC15.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RICI.L.
Performance
UC15.L vs. RICI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UC15.L is traded in GBp, while RICI.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the RICI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC15.L achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly lower than RICI.L's 32.73% return.
UC15.L
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 21.49%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 32.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
RICI.L
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- 32.73%
- 6M
- 31.58%
- 1Y
- 43.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- —
UC15.L vs. RICI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.49% | 2.57% | 6.44% | -6.52% | 29.97% | 36.11% | 21.01% |
RICI.L Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF | 32.73% | -0.85% | 6.32% | -10.69% | 30.66% | 42.40% | 19.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC15.L and RICI.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between UC15.L and RICI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
UC15.L vs. RICI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC15.L
RICI.L
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
UC15.L
RICI.L
Communication Services
UC15.L
RICI.L
Energy
UC15.L
RICI.L
-
Financial Services
UC15.L
RICI.L
Healthcare
UC15.L
RICI.L
Consumer Cyclical
UC15.L
RICI.L
Industrials
UC15.L
RICI.L
Consumer Defensive
UC15.L
RICI.L
Utilities
UC15.L
RICI.L
Basic Materials
UC15.L
RICI.L
Real Estate
UC15.L
-
RICI.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC15.L vs. RICI.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC15.L
RICI.L
UC15.L vs. RICI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (RICI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC15.L | RICI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.38 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.23 | 5.16 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 11.22 | +2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC15.L | RICI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.04 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.74 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.97 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
UC15.L vs. RICI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC15.L drawdown since its inception was -42.93%, which is greater than RICI.L's maximum drawdown of -26.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC15.L and RICI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC15.L | RICI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.93% | -26.97% | -15.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | -8.35% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.98% | -16.40% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.43% | -26.97% | +9.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -5.90% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -12.19% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 3.85% | -1.53% |
Volatility
UC15.L vs. RICI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) is 5.07%, while Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (RICI.L) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that UC15.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RICI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC15.L | RICI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 7.17% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 18.33% | -5.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 21.17% | -5.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 18.73% | -4.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 18.88% | -4.08% |
UC15.L vs. RICI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC15.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than RICI.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
UC15.L vs. RICI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UC15.L nor RICI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UC15.L and RICI.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC15.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC15.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RICI.L.
UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI, while RICI.L tracks Rogers International Commodity (RICI). They also come from different issuers: UBS and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UC15.L and 0.60% for RICI.L.
Find the right allocation for UC15.L and RICI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer