RICI.L vs. BCI
Compare and contrast key facts about Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (RICI.L) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI).
RICI.L and BCI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RICI.L is a passively managed fund by China Post Global that tracks the performance of the Rogers International Commodity (RICI). It was launched on May 8, 2006. BCI is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017.
Performance
RICI.L vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RICI.L vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RICI.L Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF | 29.08% | -0.85% | 6.32% | -10.69% | 30.66% | 42.40% | 19.41% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 25.33% | 6.87% | 7.31% | -13.35% | 28.77% | 27.37% | 14.49% |
Different Trading Currencies
RICI.L is traded in GBP, while BCI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCI values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RICI.L achieves a 29.08% return, which is significantly higher than BCI's 25.33% return.
RICI.L
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- 13.63%
- YTD
- 29.08%
- 6M
- 33.20%
- 1Y
- 25.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.65%
- 5Y*
- 15.56%
- 10Y*
- —
BCI
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 25.33%
- 6M
- 31.61%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RICI.L vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RICI.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RICI.L vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
RICI.L
BCI
RICI.L vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (RICI.L) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RICI.L | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.57 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 2.15 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.98 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 5.62 | +0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RICI.L | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.57 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.42 | +0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between RICI.L and BCI is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RICI.L vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
RICI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.37%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RICI.L Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.37% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
Drawdowns
RICI.L vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RICI.L drawdown since its inception was -26.97%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -28.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RICI.L and BCI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RICI.L | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.97% | -32.69% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -9.28% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.97% | -26.50% | -0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -0.86% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -12.19% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 3.37% | +0.66% |
Volatility
RICI.L vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (RICI.L) has a higher volatility of 10.98% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 8.53%. This indicates that RICI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RICI.L | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.98% | 8.53% | +2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.33% | 13.94% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.09% | 17.48% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 16.49% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 15.90% | +2.65% |