UC15.L vs. LEML.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and LEML.L (Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD) are both exchange-traded funds - UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI, while LEML.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC15.L returned 9.68%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for LEML.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UC15.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for LEML.L.

Performance

UC15.L vs. LEML.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC15.L achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly lower than LEML.L's 25.85% return. Over the past 10 years, UC15.L has underperformed LEML.L with an annualized return of 9.68%, while LEML.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.

UC15.L

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 21.49%
• 6M: 20.94%
• 1Y: 31.35%
• 3Y*: 10.32%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

LEML.L

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: 3.60%
• YTD: 25.85%
• 6M: 26.59%
• 1Y: 52.14%
• 3Y*: 20.41%
• 5Y*: 8.13%
• 10Y*: 10.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC15.L vs. LEML.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	21.49%	2.57%	6.44%	-6.52%	29.97%	36.11%	-2.49%	5.31%	-5.25%	-2.80%
LEML.L Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD	25.85%	24.60%	8.72%	2.68%	-10.69%	-1.92%	13.57%	13.03%	-9.98%	24.60%

Correlation

The correlation between UC15.L and LEML.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013	0.36

The correlation between UC15.L and LEML.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UC15.L vs. LEML.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UC15.L	LEML.L
Technology	31.0%	36.9%
Communication Services	15.0%	6.9%
Energy	14.2%	4.1%
Financial Services	10.9%	19.5%
Healthcare	9.8%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	9.6%
Industrials	6.6%	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	3.0%
Utilities	1.1%	2.1%
Basic Materials	0.5%	6.6%
Real Estate	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

UC15.L vs. LEML.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC15.L

UC15.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
UC15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
UC15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
UC15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UC15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UC15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

LEML.L

LEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
LEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
LEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
LEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC15.L vs. LEML.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UC15.L	LEML.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	3.14	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	4.03	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.58	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.23	4.87	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.93	16.96	-3.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC15.L vs. LEML.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC15.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the LEML.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC15.L and LEML.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UC15.L	LEML.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	3.14	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.50	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.59	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.42	-0.08

Drawdowns

UC15.L vs. LEML.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC15.L drawdown since its inception was -42.93%, which is greater than LEML.L's maximum drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC15.L and LEML.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC15.L	LEML.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.93%	-31.91%	-11.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	-10.89%	+4.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.98%	-15.34%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.43%	-24.14%	+6.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.26%	-27.59%	-2.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.53%	-2.51%	-1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.17%	-10.48%	-4.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	3.13%	-0.81%

Volatility

UC15.L vs. LEML.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) is 5.07%, while Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that UC15.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC15.L	LEML.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	7.42%	-2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.34%	14.42%	-2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.26%	16.89%	-1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.69%	16.15%	-1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.80%	17.94%	-3.14%

UC15.L vs. LEML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC15.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than LEML.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

UC15.L vs. LEML.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UC15.L nor LEML.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC15.L and LEML.L in my portfolio?

UC15.L and LEML.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC15.L or LEML.L?

On fees, UC15.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC15.L or LEML.L?

UC15.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for LEML.L.

What is the main difference between UC15.L and LEML.L?

UC15.L is categorized as Commodities, while LEML.L is Emerging Markets Equities. UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI, while LEML.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UC15.L and 0.55% for LEML.L.