LEML.L vs. MWRD.L
LEML.L (Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both exchange-traded funds - LEML.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while MWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEML.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for MWRD.L.
Performance
LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LEML.L
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 10.52%
- YTD
- 27.97%
- 6M
- 30.42%
- 1Y
- 57.27%
- 3Y*
- 21.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
MWRD.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEML.L Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD | 27.97% | 24.60% | 8.72% | 2.68% | -10.69% | -1.92% | 13.57% | 13.03% | -9.98% | 11.91% |
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World | 0.00% | 0.00% | -1.27% | 17.50% | -9.18% | 24.39% | 11.85% | 23.29% | -4.10% | 6.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEML.L and MWRD.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | 0.57 |
The correlation between LEML.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEML.L
MWRD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
LEML.L
MWRD.L
Financial Services
LEML.L
MWRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
LEML.L
MWRD.L
Industrials
LEML.L
MWRD.L
Communication Services
LEML.L
MWRD.L
Basic Materials
LEML.L
MWRD.L
Energy
LEML.L
MWRD.L
Consumer Defensive
LEML.L
MWRD.L
Healthcare
LEML.L
MWRD.L
Utilities
LEML.L
MWRD.L
Real Estate
LEML.L
MWRD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEML.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
LEML.L
MWRD.L
LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEML.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEML.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | — | — |
Drawdowns
LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEML.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.48% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | — | — |
Volatility
LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEML.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.94% | — | — |
LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEML.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LEML.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEML.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for LEML.L.
LEML.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. LEML.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for LEML.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for LEML.L and MWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer