PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEML.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LEML.L

1D
-0.87%
1M
10.52%
YTD
27.97%
6M
30.42%
1Y
57.27%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
10.95%

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEML.L
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD
27.97%24.60%8.72%2.68%-10.69%-1.92%13.57%13.03%-9.98%11.91%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.27%17.50%-9.18%24.39%11.85%23.29%-4.10%6.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LEML.L and MWRD.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.57

The correlation between LEML.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LEML.L
MWRD.L

Technology

36.9%
24.7%

Financial Services

19.5%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
10.5%

Industrials

7.5%
10.6%

Communication Services

6.9%
7.5%

Basic Materials

6.6%
3.8%

Energy

4.1%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
6.7%

Healthcare

2.9%
12.4%

Utilities

2.1%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.0%
2.4%

Technology

LEML.L
36.9%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Financial Services

LEML.L
19.5%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

LEML.L
9.6%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Industrials

LEML.L
7.5%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Communication Services

LEML.L
6.9%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Basic Materials

LEML.L
6.6%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Energy

LEML.L
4.1%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

LEML.L
3.0%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Healthcare

LEML.L
2.9%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Utilities

LEML.L
2.1%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Real Estate

LEML.L
1.0%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEML.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEML.L
LEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEML.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.25

LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LEML.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

Drawdowns

LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEML.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

Volatility

LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEML.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.94%

LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEML.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEML.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LEML.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LEML.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for LEML.L.

LEML.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. LEML.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for LEML.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEML.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer